I'm not sure which offends me more, the racism, or the sexism.

[Q Classic]

Originally posted by Kidicious
So by me telling someone that I don't want to be their friend I'm responsible for them going out and shooting someone?

Are you intentionally this obtuse?

If not that, why are you deliberately trying to conflate different issues here: the problem of social violence, which you utterly discount, the problem of physical violence, and then personal responsibility?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
Are you intentionally this obtuse?

How do YOU like it!

[Zkribbler]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I find it utterly hilarious that Kid has no idea who Mrs. Snuggles is.

I don't know either. I'm guessing it's BunnyGrrrl.

[Q Classic]

Originally posted by Kidicious
How do YOU like it!

You have as much skill parrying and rebutting arguments as Sarah Palin does answering questions.

But at least she doesn't resort to the juvenile practice of using all caps to try to emphasize certain words.

[Kidlicious]

Also your little "I Think Women Should be Able to use Blackberries so Kid is a Bigot" Thread is stupid, even for you.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
But at least she doesn't resort to the juvenile practice of using all caps to try to emphasize certain words.

Juvenile is starting a thread just to try to ambush someone because they won't respond to your stupid claims in another thread.

[Q Classic]

You were the one who continued the beef, actually. (Imran did mention it in a humorous way, but it needn't have actually progressed -- in fact, I was curious as to how others would react to that stunning example of ignorance.)

I was posting it because I wasn't sure which bothered me more; its proximity to the other thread was a temporal happenstance. You're the one assuming I did it to 'ambush' you, when it wasn't even the case.

Of course, the 'even for me' bit still sounds condescending, but that's to be expected from a mental chamberpot such as yourself.

[Q Classic]

Originally posted by Kidicious


Juvenile starting a thread just to try to ambush someone because they won't respond to your stupid claims in another thread.

Juvenile would also be pointing out that you need at least one verb in that first part of your sentence.

But I'm not going to point it out, I'm just making an observation. Y'know, just like how you don't actually insult me, my intelligence, or anyone else's by claiming that I somehow think that moderate social violence is the same as extreme physical violence.

[Kidlicious]

I do in fact claim that you are stupid. No denying that.

[onodera]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles

Well, I was using it in a rather broad and inconsistent sense, honestly. Generally, when I do refer to Asian, I do speak often of Northeast Asia; though there have been times in this thread when I've referred to the entire continent, as well.

Northeast Asia? You mean this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_Eas...deral_District

[Q Classic]

Close. But I don't live in a Russo-centric world, nor do I fear Putin rearing his head.

[Japher]

Some should read up on the name change thread...

[Kidlicious]

I figured it was Q cubed actually.

[Kidlicious]

People with rejection sensitivity , might have neuroticism .

Didn't I say there was something wrong with you guys. I'm I good or what?

Neuroticism is a fundamental personality trait in the study of psychology. It can be defined as an enduring tendency to experience negative emotional states. Individuals who score high on neuroticism are more likely than the average to experience such feelings as anxiety, anger, guilt, and clinical depression.[1] They respond more poorly to environmental stress, and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult. They are often self-conscious and shy, and they may have trouble controlling urges and delaying gratification. Neuroticism is related to emotional intelligence, which involves emotional regulation, motivation, and interpersonal skills.[2] It is also considered to be a predisposition for traditional neuroses, such as phobias and other anxiety disorders.

Emotional stability
On the opposite end of the spectrum, individuals who score low in neuroticism are more emotionally stable and less reactive to stress. They tend to be calm, even tempered, and less likely to feel tense or rattled. Although they are low in negative emotion, they are not necessarily high on positive emotion. That is an element of the independent trait of extraversion. Neurotic extraverts, for example, would experience high levels of both positive and negative emotional states, a kind of "emotional roller coaster." Individuals who score low on neuroticism (particularly those who are also high on extraversion) generally report more happiness and satisfaction with their lives.

[Q Classic]

Your point with that being...?