Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is a preversion of every natural law

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is a preversion of every natural law

    My name is Douglas M Richardson from Essexville, Michigan, and I am yet another victim of paternity fraud. However, my story has a bit of a twist, an eye-opening twist.

    Over fifteen years ago, while going through a divorce, it was brought to my attention by the eldest of two children that his mother had informed him I am not his father. This was about 1 1/2 years into the divorce proceedings. The child at that time was almost 6 years old and living with his mother and her prior boyfriend, whom I had no knowledge of during the marriage. The boy also informed me that his mother had told him the prior boyfriend, and now her live-in lover, was in fact his father.

    That revelation began my fight for genetic testing. Throughout the divorce proceedings my ex-wife, in open court, and after being asked by the judge if there was any credibility to my claims, stated on the record she was sure this was my child. Her attorney claimed it was my motivation to disregard the child support that I had voluntarily agreed to pay prior to the divorce being filed. After several attempts and motions the judge agreed to require genetic testing, but the results could not be used in court as evidence and were for medical reasons only.

    When my ex-wife found the tests were going to be completed, through her attorney she went to the friend of the court and openly admitted the oldest child was not mine. Through the friend of the court she proposed an agreement that there would be no support or visitation with his or my child. The child in question was then living with his biological father and was well aware of the situation. Her attorney drew up the agreement and even though there were two children of the marriage, one of whom was mine, my attorney told me to go along with this and we could file a motion later to seek visitation for my child.

    The judge wanted this agreement brought before the court for signing. However,. at that point he made several capricious changes to the agreement. First, the judge maliciously entered an order to support and carry health care on both children despite the prior agreement. Then he terminated my visitation rights to my child as well. Of course no penalties were imposed on my adulterous ex-wife.

    So for the last 15 years, enslaved, I have paid the support for both children while they lived with the father of the first child. Obviously everyone, including the judge, have been fully aware of the fraud since the court entered the order. And, to add insult to injury, her boyfriend (the biological father) sat in the courtroom through the divorce proceedings.

    I have since learned that my ex-wife gave a child up for adoption eight months before I met her. The same man was the father of that child as well and wanted nothing to do with that baby.

    In April 2001 I received a letter from the friend of the court stating the mother had moved out of the house leaving the children behind, basically abandoning them with this man. At that point the court granted him custody of not only his child but my child as well. The judge also issued an order directing that all payments I make go directly to the biological father of my ex-wife's child. Not only was I paying this man to raise his own child, but my child as well. Further, I was never notified until after this occurred and the court order entered.

    When the mother moved out of her boyfriend's home in 2001 she was also ordered to pay the father child support. Thus, her boyfriend was receiving child support from two separate people to raise his own child.

    The child is now 20-years old and doesn't even live with his father. But the courts say I have an arrearage of $6,700 that has accumulated over the last 15 years. To date this case, between the support and health care, has cost me well over $150,000.

    In 2005 my child moved back in with my ex-wife and on September 19 th the court issued an order for me to pay her child support for our child. However, I was not notified of the custody change or the court order until I received a letter dated January 20, 2006, from the friend of the court, Elizabeth Roszatycki.

    As this case stands today, I pay the father, my ex-wife's boyfriend, child support on an arrearage for a child that isn't mine and a child that no longer lives with him. I also pay the mother child support for the second child.

    Some ask why I have just paid the support? The answer, though unjust, is quite easy. When the divorce proceeding were over my attorney told me there was nothing I could do, just live with it.

    Even though the second child is mine I have tape recorded phone conversations from 1990 of the mother stating that I will never be allowed to have anything to do with either of these children. She stated then that she would simply erase me out of the picture so her, the children, and her boyfriend can go on with their lives as a family. And she did just that with the full support of the courts all the way.

    I felt compared to share this injustice with you and can provide documentation on request.

    Douglas M Richardson



    This is just sick


    Hey you guys do you think stuff like this might have something to do with fewer people getting maried in western countries?

    Misandry The legal order seems to be biased towards having the mother be right waay to much.


    But seriusly this just promotes bad gentic survival strategies.
    Last edited by Heraclitus; May 25, 2008, 17:32.
    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

  • #2
    *perversion
    THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
    AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
    AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
    DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

    Comment


    • #3
      Hey you guys do you think stuff like this might have something to do with fewer people getting maried in western countries?
      Yes, I believe this as well, there are some very decent women out there, but so many that are horrible.

      I suggest you put on your flamesuit, heraclitus.
      Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
      "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
      2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

      Comment


      • #4
        Congratulations on your third threadi of teh day, BTW
        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey you guys do you think stuff like this might have something to do with fewer people getting maried in western countries?


          Wouldn't matter. Simply having kids would subject you to this.

          But yea, the pro-mother bias in the courts needs to be challenged at ever opportunity.
          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by LordShiva
            Congratulations on your third threadi of teh day, BTW
            Its past midnight here.
            Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
            The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
            The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

              I suggest you put on your flamesuit, heraclitus.

              I always put one on when I tell the truth.
              Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
              The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
              The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

              Comment


              • #8
                Hey you guys do you think stuff like this might have something to do with fewer people getting maried in western countries?


                Nah, I think it has more to do with increased wealth. It used to be neccessary to pair up for a variety of reasons that aren't present any more (starting from economic security).

                The chance that your offspring isn't really yours has been present in human societies since... always.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by VetLegion

                  The chance that your offspring isn't really yours has been present in human societies since... always.
                  Duh? But I do suppose societies that lock up their women and guard them by eunuchs generaly have better chances.
                  Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                  The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                  The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Douglas is an idiot. He hired a lousy lawyer and then mmekly said okay to everything the lawyer told him.

                    What a tool.

                    ACK!
                    Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yes, divorce court is horridly anti-father, but there are ways of protecting ones self. As for the marriage issue, he would not have had to pay for the child that was not his if he was not married, and didn't make a legally binding agreement to pay for said child.

                      In the early 70s the law was the old english common law, that solves a lot of issues:
                      1)A bastard is the child of no man.
                      2)All children in a married household belong to the Father.

                      That first one however was changed so that women could sue men for paternity, they did not similarly change the second law.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                        Hey you guys do you think stuff like this might have something to do with fewer people getting maried in western countries?


                        Wouldn't matter. Simply having kids would subject you to this.

                        But yea, the pro-mother bias in the courts needs to be challenged at ever opportunity.
                        From my experience, mothers are insane people who shouldn't be allowed near their own children.
                        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                        "Capitalism ho!"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DaShi
                          From my experience, mothers are insane people who shouldn't be allowed near their own children.
                          Asher would agree with you.
                          "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Is this any surprise?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Then there's the other extreme.
                              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                              "Capitalism ho!"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X