Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In Soviet Russia, friends leave you

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Who keeps American dominance in Eastern Europe in check?
    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Comment


    • #92
      We want to prevent that?

      Comment


      • #93
        You don't we blue & gold guys do.
        Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
        The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
        The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

        Comment


        • #94
          Some of you.

          A lot of you seem perfectly happy to fall under the American umbrella. It's a lot more comfortable there than under the Russian one.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Kuciwalker


            For one, there's preventing the resurgence of Russian dominance in Eastern Europe
            There wouldn't be dominance by any single given country with such a broad treaty organization handling security. Russia qualifies to be a part of NATO as much as the US does.

            Comment


            • #96
              There wouldn't be dominance by any single given country with such a broad treaty organization handling security.


              If everyone is a member, no one might as well be a member.

              An alliance is defined as much by who isn't in it as who is.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Geronimo


                There wouldn't be dominance by any single given country with such a broad treaty organization handling security. Russia qualifies to be a part of NATO as much as the US does.
                Are you saying NATO isn't dominated by a certain country now?
                "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                Comment


                • #98
                  I'm pretty sure he was acknowledging the opposite.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    I would like to see both the Ukraine and Georgia in NATO though both need to solve their territorial disputes before joining. Other wise there is a chance the territorial disputes could cause problems in the future. Also Russia needs to stop trying to **** things up just for the sake of ****ing things up.
                    Last edited by Dinner; April 6, 2008, 06:42.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by onodera

                      But don't you think that allying with Russia would be the best way to avoid a conflict with it?
                      I would like to see a stable and democratic Russia as a full member of NATO some day but right now the Russian government is acting very autocratically; perhapses even dictatorially. That just doesn't fit in with the preamble of the NATO treaty which identifies common democratic principles of government being a corner stone of the alliance.

                      One day, hopefully, Russia will learn that the west isn't their enemy and that for one to be successful the other has to lose something. We can all gain together by working together. At the end of the day Russia really is more European in its history then Asian so with luck we'll all agree to work for peace and stability.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                        There wouldn't be dominance by any single given country with such a broad treaty organization handling security.


                        If everyone is a member, no one might as well be a member.

                        An alliance is defined as much by who isn't in it as who is.
                        Russia was obviously very enthusiastic about the ideals that nominally unite the NATO countries immediately after throwing the communists out of power. NATO countries should be democracies and Russias democracy was as real as any former communist bloc country.

                        Basically NATO should have been a way for the major democracies to have a mechanism of common defense. Keeping Russia at arms length goes a long way towards explaining the differences between it's political development and that of the other eastern bloc countries that were admitted to NATO. Democracies that feel threatened by hostile isolation feel a lot of pressure to sacrifice democracy (and anything else) for security.
                        Last edited by Geronimo; April 6, 2008, 10:12.

                        Comment


                        • Geronimo knows a thing or two about the situation.
                          Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                          The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                          The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Geronimo


                            Russia was obviously very enthusiastic about the ideals that nominally unite the NATO countries immediately after throwing the communists out of power. NATO countries should be democracies and Russias democracy was as real as any former communist bloc country.

                            Basically NATO should have been a way for the major democracies to have a mechanism of common defense. Keeping Russia at arms length goes a long way towards explaining the differences between it's political development and that of the other eastern bloc countries that were admitted to NATO. Democracies that feel threatened by hostile isolation feel a lot of pressure to sacrifice democracy (and anything else) for security.
                            Nonsense. NATO is no excuse for Russia's situation.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                              A lot of you seem perfectly happy to fall under the American umbrella. It's a lot more comfortable there than under the Russian one.
                              You know, it's not the Russian umbrella that's the alternative to the American one...

                              Comment


                              • Comment

                                Working...
                                X