Hillary Clinton calls Bosnia sniper story a mistake

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

The point of objectionable racism regardless of its origin is in order to make the originators race superior to the targetted race. In this case, the victimization meme allows feelings of moral superiority and martyrdom, (perfectly sympathetic with much of judeo-christian biblical history) at the expense of the inevitable comeupance of whitey because he is a morally inferior being.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
If you get bit by a dog, you might forever be wary of dogs. You or may not be able to work past it. That still doesn't mean all dogs bite. Not all of anything is anything. Absolutes are wrong.

So what are you saying, that someone who is afraid of dogs wouldn't be a good president?

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Kidicious


Taht means a lot - NOT!

It was illustrative of your inane requirements for the passages to be interpretted.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
The point of objectionable racism regardless of its origin is in order to make the originators race superior to the targetted race. In this case, the victimization meme allows feelings of moral superiority and martyrdom, (perfectly sympathetic with much of judeo-christian biblical history) at the expense of the inevitable comeupance of whitey because he is a morally inferior being.

Oh yea, because blacks are superior in this country?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


It was illustrative of your inane requirements for the passages to be interpretted.

So you think you are qualified to understand what he said better than anyone else?

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

No I am qualified and entitled to my own opinion. Your BS would have anyone not in a very small schism be unable to formuloate an opinion on the matter. What Dog squeeze.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Kidicious


Oh yea, because blacks are superior in this country?

The point being to his audience there was a calculated effort to imply moral superiority over another racial group based upon reasons of race alone.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
No I am qualified and entitled to my own opinion. Your BS would have anyone not in a very small schism be unable to formuloate an opinion on the matter. What Dog squeeze.

Bull****! You're the one pretending to be an expert. Don't switch that around on me.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

I pretend no such thing. I used your BS requirement to show the fallacy of your so called logic.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


The point being to his audience there was a calculated effort to imply moral superiority over another racial group based upon reasons of race alone.

Even if that were true, and it's not, what does "moral" superiority have to do with anything. I think I'm morally superior to you as a matter of fact. What the hell should you care? In fact, I'm sure you feel the same way about me. That doesn't matter for ****. The fact is that the greed of white people is a problem. That's all that matters.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
I pretend no such thing. I used your BS requirement to show the fallacy of your so called logic.

That's quite different. So you don't think that a congregation understands their preacher better than outsiders do? Strange belief indeed. Have any argument to support that claim?

[asleepathewheel]

Why is it greed of white people and not just plain old human greed?

Why the need to racialize the issue when some degree of greed is inherent to all humans, and certainly to anyone with political power, white, black or whatever race/religion/creed.

[asleepathewheel]

Originally posted by Kidicious


That's quite different. So you don't think that a congregation understands their preacher better than outsiders do? Strange belief indeed. Have any argument to support that claim?

Seems like an untenable standard to me.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by asleepathewheel
Why is it greed of white people and not just plain old human greed?

Why the need to racialize the issue when some degree of greed is inherent to all humans, and certainly to anyone with political power, white, black or whatever race/religion/creed.

Do you think he approves of greedy black people, or believes that all black people aren't greedy? Come on now. You need to think twice about that. At the least realise that you are jumping to conclusions.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Kidicious


Even if that were true, and it's not, what does "moral" superiority have to do with anything.

Quite a bit in the case of Obama considering the moral underpinnings of Obama are linked strongly to the man in question. The entirety of the question is whether or not Obama feels one race is morally superior to another. Arguements abound on either side of the equation defending or refuting the assertion.

I think I'm morally superior to you as a matter of fact. What the hell should you care? In fact, I'm sure you feel the same way about me. That doesn't matter for ****. The fact is that the greed of white people is a problem. That's all that matters.

Funny in my congregation it normally is refered to as the greed of people is a problem. The need to insinuate white into the equation is where the problems start.