Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Where does the constitution speak of Marriage as a fundamental right to individuals? I don't even see it anywhere in the Charter let alone the constitution.
Marriage is not an individual right, like life, liberty and security of the person because it requires the consent of another person. Free speech and the like are all individual rights, marriage is not.
Where does the constitution speak of Marriage as a fundamental right to individuals? I don't even see it anywhere in the Charter let alone the constitution.
Marriage is not an individual right, like life, liberty and security of the person because it requires the consent of another person. Free speech and the like are all individual rights, marriage is not.
The bill is flawed because those who are against SSM chose to abstain as they felt that the bill forced them to support SSM whether they voted for or against the bill.
Thank you again Asher.
Jews, Muslims, and Christians of all stripes whether they be Catholics, mainline or evangelicals all are opposed to SSM.
So I don't see why this is Christian tolitarianism.
Jews, Muslims, and Christians of all stripes whether they be Catholics, mainline or evangelicals all are opposed to SSM.
So I don't see why this is Christian tolitarianism.
Comment