The College Football Thread 2006

[Guynemer]

My educated guess would be Arkansas.

But throw in an Arkansas loss to LSU next week? Well, then the correct answer is:

Who the **** knows?

[Ming]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
The main thing the BCS did was to assure that if there were two undefeated teams at the end of the season, they would play each other for the national title. No more, no less. People who expect more out of it are deluding themselves...

Can you say Rutgers...
or Boise State...

[Drake Tungsten]

You think Rutgers or Boise State is going to agree with that statement?

I've already said that it's bull**** if Rutgers goes undefeated and doesn't get a shot in the BCS title game. Then again, if the incessant criticism of the BCS hadn't forced them to remove the strength of schedule component and reduce the importance of the computer poll component, Rutgers would be doing just fine...

As for Boise State, they aren't a part of the BCS. Sucks to be them, but their conference schedule is so weak that no one can be assured that they are legit.

[MRT144]

Originally posted by Guynemer
My educated guess would be Arkansas.

But throw in an Arkansas loss to LSU next week? Well, then the correct answer is:

Who the **** knows?

right, i forgot that part. i mean if this happens how could michigan not go, right?

[TCO]

Originally posted by MRT144
scenerio:

usc loses to cal
usc beats nd
ark beats flo
rutgers loses to wvu

who goes to the national championship?

Ark if they have only one loss. Otherwise, UM or perhaps WVU. Wake in the unlikely event they win out.

[MRT144]

well, i forgot to add lsu into beating arkansas

[Donegeal]

The BCS was susposed to make sure that the #1 team in the NCAA played the #2 team. Now if almost everybody thinks that Michigan is the #2 team, then they should be playing in the national Championship game. After all, the only loss Mich has was a close game to the #1 team.

Speaking of which, since OSU was #1 and Mich lost a game that it was susposed to, why would they drop at all? Hell, they even beat the spread.

[Eroberer]

Early observations from Cal - USC:

1) Cal's efense blows. I guess some of us knew this all along.
2) Michigan is better than both of these teams!

edit: misspelled efense. Their ain't no 'd' in that efense.

[MRT144]

goddamnit! what a play by cal

[MRT144]

rutgers is down 16-0

wtf

[Eroberer]

I guess that was the right call. TD overturned. Cal's efense can go out and suck some more.

Rutgers better score some points.

[reismark]

Well, it's not like Rutgers hasn't made a comeback before. Even if they do, though, this ain't gonna impress the pollsters.

[MRT144]

saaaaaaaaaaaaafety!!

[Eroberer]

Well, Rutgers is going down. Neither Cal nor USC is the #2 team in the nation. They are both pretty pathetic. I guess it's either an SEC team or Michigan against OSU this year.

[Ming]

It should be Michigan.... because if ND is the last good remaining team, they lost at home to Michigan