Interesting that the secular press in the US has been pretty much all positive with regard to JPII, while noting his critics. For instance, the WaPo had one token negative article among wall-to-wall coverage, which repeats all of AH's criticisms.
I wonder if he's just looked at more favorably in the US than elsewhere because he is seen state-side as one of the main men who brought down communism and ended the balance of terror. He certainly did a great, tangible service to the US.
I wonder if he's just looked at more favorably in the US than elsewhere because he is seen state-side as one of the main men who brought down communism and ended the balance of terror. He certainly did a great, tangible service to the US.
Comment