Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Apostates of Islam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul made a great impact on it, but it was impact of God through him.
    And the basis of Christianity is still Jesus.

    And hadith and shari'a are separate from Al-Qur'an, but are hardly separable from Islam. Only Qaddafi wants to get rid of hadiths.
    "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
    I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
    Middle East!

    Comment



    • That particular incident actually has a bit more complicated historiography than that. Apparantly, the source (not the Qur'an) that says male Median Jews were killed (and women and children enslaved) isn't corroberated up by other sources of the period. Historians tend to believe that the particular source made it up as a form of propaganda to make Muslims seem badazz (not unlike how a lot of historians believe that the genocide of the Canaanites by the Jews may have been fabricated).


      Most chances are you're right. ( In the case of the genocide of the canaanites by the jews, you really have to raise an eyebrow, since most chances are the jews are canaanites )
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • Many Muslims don't care for the Hadiths. It's perfectly seperable from Islam.
        "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
        -Bokonon

        Comment


        • In the case of the genocide of the canaanites by the jews, you really have to raise an eyebrow, since most chances are the jews are canaanites


          Right.
          "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
          -Bokonon

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Ramo
            hey killed all the Jews of Medina, so I'd say it could be interpreted that way.




            That particular incident actually has a bit more complicated historiography than that. Apparantly, the source (not the Qur'an) that says male Medinan Jews were killed (and women and children enslaved) isn't corroberated up by other sources of the period. Historians tend to believe that the particular source made it up as a form of propaganda to make Muslims seem badazz (not unlike how a lot of historians believe that the genocide of the Canaanites by the Jews may have been fabricated).
            The author of the chronicle was Muslim (though of Jewish descent), it's hard to imagine He'd like to make Muslim seem badazz.
            Also, no-one questioned the fact until recently, when it became uncomfortable.
            And also, some hadiths seem to back the story
            "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
            I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
            Middle East!

            Comment


            • since most chances are the jews are canaanites
              not true

              Many Muslims don't care for the Hadiths. It's perfectly seperable from Islam.
              Many Christians don't care about what Jesus has said
              What's important is what Muslim scholars say.
              "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
              I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
              Middle East!

              Comment



              • not true


                enlighten me.
                urgh.NSFW

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Heresson


                  Bad joke. There was no sex in it. Mary remained virgin.


                  sure she did...
                  12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                  Stadtluft Macht Frei
                  Killing it is the new killing it
                  Ultima Ratio Regum

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Heresson

                    not true
                    Let me guess, you think the psudohistory in the first few books of the old testament are true?

                    Comment


                    • The author of the chronicle was Muslim (though of Jewish descent), it's hard to imagine He'd like to make Muslim seem badazz.
                      Also, no-one questioned the fact until recently, when it became uncomfortable.
                      And also, some hadiths seem to back the story


                      1. Why not, if he's a fanatic? Notice how when a terrorist attack happens, sometimes a number of groups try to claim it as their own?
                      2. History gets written in the interests of those in power. You realize there's a reason why historians exist today, right?
                      3. The Hadiths have been written and rewritten, distorted, etc., etc. It's practically useless as a primary source for Mohammed's time.
                      "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                      -Bokonon

                      Comment


                      • it's also possible that they actually did it. It's not like it was unheard of at the time.
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • 1. Why not, if he's a fanatic? Notice how when a terrorist attack happens, sometimes a number of groups try to claim it as their own?
                          A pretty dramatic line of defense
                          Well, by saying this, You actually admit that the massacre took place, You just question who's done it.
                          And who else could?

                          2. You realize there's a reason why historians exist, right?
                          Enlighten me

                          3. The Hadiths have been written and rewritten, distorted, etc., etc. It's practically useless as a primary source for Mohammed's time.
                          Do we have any other source but hadith and Al-Qur'an?

                          I do not fancy the history of this era. I base my knowledge on a book by mr Stepien. Discuss with him.
                          "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                          I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                          Middle East!

                          Comment


                          • What's important is what Muslim scholars say.


                            Right, which is why Christians are a bunch of schismatic heretics. Actually, so are Jews, what are they thinking? Zoroastrianism
                            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                            -Bokonon

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by KrazyHorse




                              sure she did...
                              You do not have proof for your theories. I at least have hungreds of years of tradition.
                              "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                              I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                              Middle East!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Heresson

                                I at least have hungreds of years of tradition.
                                Tradition is stupid, throw rocks at it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X