The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Come on, Dan. If the reason you don't want 18 year olds to vote is that they don't own property then you have to defend the position that ownership of property should be a requirement to vote...
I'm not going to defend it against irrelevant arguments.
then you have to defend the position that ownership of property should be a requirement to vote
I don't have to do any such thing. What are you blathering on about?
And it did so in Canada too.
Except we weren't in Vietnam...
It was simply an acknowledgement that along with responsibilities come rights.
18 year olds have every legal responsibility that you do. Their parents might relieve them of the burden of paying for themselves, just as there are some housewives in the US who never lift a finger outside the home. Doesn't mean we disenfranchise those without jobs...
In the US, the drinking age was raised to 21 after Vietnam. So there is some precedent. Besides, I think you can be 17 and be in the Army.
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Your point was that if 18-year olds have all the responsibility, they should have all the rights. While in most cases, this seems like a sensible way to go, there are already exceptions to the rule to reflect the long history of adulthood at age 21.
Besides, it would be pretty damn boring to list "18" below all the items in the lead post.
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Originally posted by DanS
Your point was that if 18-year olds have all the responsibility, they should have all the rights. While in most cases, this seems like a sensible way to go, there are already exceptions to the rule to reflect the long history of adulthood at age 21.
And you've thus created a group of people with all the responsibility who are missing some of the rights. Screw that.
Until you do, though, you lose any claim to being logically consistent in my view.
Who ever said I wanted to claim that?
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Meh. Suit youself. Consistency has about zero utility in this discussion. There are some rights given well before responsibilities in my list. I feel no need to make everything consistent.
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Yes, I'm crying in my beer for them. You know, the one I can buy because I'm at least 21 years of age.
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment