Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Age rights- draw your lines

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Actually, I agree on the drinking at age 18, but on different grounds than some ridiculous "consistency" argument that you've trotted out.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

    Comment


    • #92
      I happen to think it's good to be consistent...
      To us, it is the BEAST.

      Comment


      • #93
        Incidentally, there's a long history of drinking and voting. No less a personage than George Washington got his whole constituency drunk as a campaign gift on election day.

        We need consistent drinking and voting laws. 21.
        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by DanS
          Actually, I agree on the drinking at age 18, but on different grounds than some ridiculous "consistency" argument that you've trotted out.
          Some people think that it's a good idea when studying law and morality to have a set of fundamental principles which are then applied to specific questions to provide answers.
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment


          • #95
            please feel free to annotate your responses with the phrase "I wouldn't recognise pragmatism even if it had spent the past millennium with my genitals in its mouth"
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #96
              pragmatic?

              as long as it fits in DanS's ownership society ideology, right?
              To us, it is the BEAST.

              Comment


              • #97
                So you want to disenfranchise approximately 6% of the US voting age public (who already have one of the lowest participation rates) based on pragmatic reasons?



                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                Killing it is the new killing it
                Ultima Ratio Regum

                Comment


                • #98
                  who already have one of the lowest participation rates
                  Precisely so. They don't vote because they are away at college and don't feel they have a sufficient stake in society to force themselves to vote.
                  I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    don't feel they have a sufficient stake in society
                    that's reasoning based upon your sick ideology, DanS... that's not pragmatism.
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DanS


                      Precisely so. They don't vote because they are away at college and don't feel they have a sufficient stake in society to force themselves to vote.
                      So where's the pragmatic necessity in taking away their vote?
                      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                      Stadtluft Macht Frei
                      Killing it is the new killing it
                      Ultima Ratio Regum

                      Comment


                      • Where's the pragmatic necessity of giving them the vote?
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • I didn't say there was one. I said it was a question of idealism.
                          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                          Stadtluft Macht Frei
                          Killing it is the new killing it
                          Ultima Ratio Regum

                          Comment


                          • Come on, Dan. You're making this too easy...

                            Either you're arguing from pragmatism or idealism

                            If you're arguing from pragmatism then show me your pragmatic reasons

                            If you're arguing from idealism then you should probably be consistent...
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • I said it was a question of idealism.
                              As I read it, you said it was a question of consistency.
                              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                              Comment


                              • maybe consistency is his ideal
                                To us, it is the BEAST.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X