Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The USA and Britian can be knick out of the UN.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Serb


    Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq.
    I know that Iraq was disarm already we have certain right wing idiot in our government who want to next invade Iran ,Syria, India, Pakistian, North Korea, China, Russia, and France. It easier to make and hide biowarfare factory than nuclear weapon factory. Any person with chemical knowlge can make chemical weapon with than simple lab but with than hight risk of killing himself.
    I know Ming doesnot like people calling other people idiot but I realy question the wisdom of they preempty attack idear as it can lead to use makeing big mistake. Bush will not be reelectic by the America people.
    By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Serb


      Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq.
      Serb, I don't think Bush give a dam about Iraq oil, but he need a base for Iran. If he has a base in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran is in the middle. Keep in mine Iran does not have the bomb yet, and now would be the best time to stop them before they get the bomb. Would you like Iran to have the bomb when they openly support terrorist and are just south of you, what a 1,000 miles (1600 kmt) or so. We know for sure that Al-Queda operate in Iran freely.

      BTW I did want Saddam gone. I was hoping for a hearth attack. I'm not antiwar or pro-war. That may be hard for you to understand coming from me. But since we are there, I want minimal causalities on both our side and the Iraqi civilian side. For the Iraqi soldiers if they give up so be it (good), however for those who fight bye bye, see you in the next life.

      Joseph

      Comment


      • Originally posted by CharlesBHoff


        I know that Iraq was disarm already we have certain right wing idiot in our government who want to next invade Iran ,Syria, India, Pakistian, North Korea, China, Russia, and France. It easier to make and hide biowarfare factory than nuclear weapon factory. Any person with chemical knowlge can make chemical weapon with than simple lab but with than hight risk of killing himself.
        I know Ming doesnot like people calling other people idiot but I realy question the wisdom of they preempty attack idear as it can lead to use makeing big mistake. Bush will not be reelectic by the America people.
        Not quite. Just Iran and North Korea for now.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Serb


          Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq.
          Serb, if you still think this war is about oil, i roll my eyes at you
          "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
          - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
          Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

          Comment


          • Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq.
            You're right! It's Russia's oil contracts!
            urgh.NSFW

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Joseph
              Not quite. Just Iran and North Korea for now.
              North Korea already have 30 to 40 250 kilotonne to 500 kilotonne nuclear weapon already with than 12000 to 14000 miles missile to deliver then to their target.
              By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

              Comment


              • The UN will never kick US and UK. If they did that they wouldn't be able to continue stealing (sorry, I mean getting) all that money from them.
                "Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
                "A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Kramerman


                  Serb, if you still think this war is about oil, i roll my eyes at you
                  what is it about, then? please tell me but try to avoid propaganda reasons like disarming iraq and freeing iraqi people

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Serb


                    Tell me Heresson, Is Poland already joined the anti-Iraq coalition?

                    When you are planing to start kissing of uncle Sam's as*?
                    Our gouverment already does it. I'm not going to.
                    You are not kissing their ass on the other hand, You are just eating its sh..

                    Surprisingly, La Russo is not Russian, and Serb is not Serbian.
                    Sorry.
                    "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                    I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                    Middle East!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Kramerman
                      Serb, if you still think this war is about oil, i roll my eyes at you
                      This war is sure not all about oil, but is partly about oil. The US need a reliable source of oil to deal with Saudi Arabia, terrorism-financer extraordinaire (I have been more detailed in several other posts, and I get bored writing the same thing over and over again, so no details for you ). So far, the US were handcuffed by Saudi, which explains how low the tensions are, with a regime obviously linked with terrorism and Al Qaeda.
                      I suppose you would agree with this statement, K.
                      "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                      "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                      "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Spiffor

                        This war is sure not all about oil, but is partly about oil. The US need a reliable source of oil to deal with Saudi Arabia, terrorism-financer extraordinaire (I have been more detailed in several other posts, and I get bored writing the same thing over and over again, so no details for you ). So far, the US were handcuffed by Saudi, which explains how low the tensions are, with a regime obviously linked with terrorism and Al Qaeda.
                        I suppose you would agree with this statement, K.
                        The Saudi government isnot behind terrorism as the Iraq government isnot behind terrorism there are no terrorist in this world only freedom fighter. Iran support freedom fighter
                        which are fighting for they stole land which Irsael stole from then. Irsael is automatic guiely of libel and slander by calling
                        freedom fighter terrorist get the correct view.
                        By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

                        Comment


                        • The US need a reliable source of oil to deal with Saudi Arabia, terrorism-financer extraordinaire


                          Spiff, even with ALL the oil in Iraq, I bet the US would continue its current relationship with the Saudis.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • Imran :
                            Except if I understate the paranoia and resentment that came from Sept. 11, I assume the Bushies will take whatever step necessary to reduce international terrorism.
                            Of course I cannot be sure, but I think many people in the American folk and in the White House are very pissed with the Sauds. If they are unshackled with their dependancy to the Sauds, the US will probably want to take action. Not necessarily war, but pressure on other aspects.
                            Before, the Sauds could simply have lowered their oil output, maybe with the help of OPEC countries. With Iraq in the hands of the US, they will lose very much of their bargaining power.
                            "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                            "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                            "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                            Comment


                            • Umm... didn't we argue about all this in that "other" thread???
                              A true ally stabs you in the front.

                              Secretary General of the U.N. & IV Emperor of the Glory of War PTWDG | VIII Consul of Apolyton PTW ISDG | GoWman in Stormia CIVDG | Lurker Troll Extraordinaire C3C ISDG Final | V Gran Huevote Team Latin Lover | Webmaster Master Zen Online | CivELO (3°)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Spiffor
                                Imran :
                                Except if I understate the paranoia and resentment that came from Sept. 11, I assume the Bushies will take whatever step necessary to reduce international terrorism.
                                Of course I cannot be sure, but I think many people in the American folk and in the White House are very pissed with the Sauds. If they are unshackled with their dependancy to the Sauds, the US will probably want to take action. Not necessarily war, but pressure on other aspects.
                                Before, the Sauds could simply have lowered their oil output, maybe with the help of OPEC countries. With Iraq in the hands of the US, they will lose very much of their bargaining power.
                                America is the biggest productor of oil in the world also we are the biggest user of oil and the biggest waster of oil in the world. Than we are getting worst each year. The fuel cell
                                power car in america is than pipe dream the cost for than adverage america to buy than mass product fuel cell power
                                car is around 800,000 to 1,000,000 dollar. To than adverage america to own one will take than 40 year to 80 year car loan and the big car companies in America will
                                lose money when they built than car that last 80 year and
                                what about the labour union's. The test model car which
                                run off of fuel cell cost 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 dollar to built apeise.
                                By the year 2100 AD over half of the world population will be follower of Islam.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X