The USA and Britian can be knick out of the UN.

[CharlesBHoff]

I wouldnot be surpise it the General Assembly of the UN kink
the USA and Britian out of the UN and off the security council
and take away they status as permant members of the security council. Than we will have no veto power over this
as only the General Assembly of the UN have the power to decide who is than member of the UN and who isnot than member of the UN and the General Assembly have the power to grant permant status to than nation on the security council or remove permant status from than security
council member this power is grant to the General assembly of the UN by the UN Chater. It doesnot even go to the security council for they approval at all. Cuba is than member of the UN after Fidical took power and the USA was powerless to do anything about it.

[The Mad Monk]

Knick us out of the UN?

Those rotten kidnappers!

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Knick us out of the UN?

Those rotten kidnappers!

It you ever watch America Baseball the Umtripe have the right to expell players and mangerable from the game for not following certain rules like no punching than other player, or trying to hit than other player over the head with than baseball bat. Only the baseball commission or all the tearm owner can overruled than Umtripe ruleing an that happen very very rarely.
The UN have the right and the power to expell member who donot follow the rules of the UN.

[C0ckney]

they might even kink us out, the dirty devils...

[Robert]

don't be an idiot.
China, France and Russia haven't been kicked out of the security council after what they did in tjetsenie, Tibet and Ivorcoast as well.

I think the USA and the UK will kick Russia, FRance and CHina out of it earlier. (but even that will not happen)

[Demerzel]

somehow I seriously doubt that they would kick us out of the UN unless they wanted to cause its demise.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by CyberShy
don't be an idiot.
China, France and Russia haven't been kicked out of the security council after what they did in tjetsenie, Tibet and Ivorcoast as well.

I think the USA and the UK will kick Russia, FRance and CHina out of it earlier. (but even that will not happen)

This isnot the security council that does this , it the General Assembly of the UN all 180's plus member with no nation haveing the veto power. It USA and Britian piss off too many
small nation they can do this to use , just to get back at use.
Busk threaten the President of Mexico that if Mexico doesnot vote the way Bush want then to on the Security Council Bush will have every Mexico in America arrest and he
might invade Mexico too. Bush also threaten other small nations on the Council excpect for Pakistan as Pakistian have nuclear weapon already.
All of these threat he make to the smaller nations on the security council backfire on Bush.. The America Media
was trying to give false infro saying the vote was close on the Security Council and only the threat of Frence veto force Bush to go outside the UN. The vote at UN security
Council would have been 4 yes and either 8 or 11 no votes.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by Demerzel
somehow I seriously doubt that they would kick us out of the UN unless they wanted to cause its demise.

Bush need the UN more than the UN need him. Only the UN the the power to declare alot of action legal or illegal.

[The Mad Monk]

Is this guy for real?

[CerberusIV]

The UN is going to be more about humanitarian aid than world security after this. If the US is kicked out the UN will not have enough money to do anything. If the UK is kicked out that will jeopardise their aid contributions.

If the US and UK are out of the UN they will continue to invade whoever the hell they like and simply ignore an irrelevant UN.

Basically it isn't going to happen because the UN needs the US more than the US needs the UN. End.

[DRoseDARs]

Originally posted by CharlesBHoff


Bush need the UN more than the UN need him. Only the UN the the power to declare alot of action legal or illegal.

50 years of world and UN history says otherwise...

[Fidel]

Originally posted by CyberShy
don't be an idiot.
China, France and Russia haven't been kicked out of the security council after what they did in tjetsenie, Tibet and Ivorcoast as well.

I think the USA and the UK will kick Russia, FRance and CHina out of it earlier. (but even that will not happen)

except that tibet and chechnya are part of china and russia respectively...and that france did not lead a coalition of agressors against ivory coast.

[TheStinger]

Well Tibet being part of China is debateable.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by CerberusIV
The UN is going to be more about humanitarian aid than world security after this. If the US is kicked out the UN will not have enough money to do anything. If the UK is kicked out that will jeopardise their aid contributions.

If the US and UK are out of the UN they will continue to invade whoever the hell they like and simply ignore an irrelevant UN.

Basically it isn't going to happen because the UN needs the US more than the US needs the UN. End.

Not realy. I than sure other nations will give the UN more money once the USA and Britian are out of the UN. America doesnot have the manpower and resource to occuprate the
whole world.

[Fidel]

Originally posted by TheStinger
Well Tibet being part of China is debateable.

so is scotland or n. ireland being part of the UK