The papers say, "Bush incompetent".

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
He's the Monty Python of Apolyton! Absolutely hilarious!

Are we talking laugh at, or laugh with?

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Agathon


How witty - yeah it's incredibly bigoted not to like line dancing or to make fun of Country and Western. Thanks for not posting - you would definitely spoil the thread.

Anyway - stop all the threadjacks. This is supposed to be about Bush's fine achievements in international diplomacy, like alienating the world.

I've heard enough of your bigoted spew about Alberta, buddy.

Hint, if you don't want your thread jacked, don't jack it by acting like a moron who knows no better than to post inflamatory crap about entire regions.

Grand Dragon, indeed. You seem to be a Grand Dragon of the argumentatively challenged. You can't seem to do it without falling back on gross generalisations tarring entire groups based on where they are from.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Agathon
Are we talking laugh at, or laugh with?

With Zylka, there is no distinction.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Are we talking laugh at, or laugh with?

laugh with.... and laugh at YOU .

[Agathon]

Originally posted by notyoueither

I've heard enough of your bigoted spew about Alberta, buddy.

Oh dear - did you take that literally? I guess so...

I thought the piece about Albertans blaming the Liberals for the poor performance of their NHL teams would have been enough to establish the intended tone.

Never mind...

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

Are we talking laugh at, or laugh with?

laugh with.... and laugh at YOU .

The fool's reproach is a kingly title

William Blake

[Imran Siddiqui]

And you merely reinforce your arrogant, think-to-much of yourself attidude that we laugh at.

Congrats.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
And you merely reinforce your arrogant, think-to-much of yourself attidude that we laugh at.

We - I take it you are using the royal "we". Or is this the "we" that signifies the people who agree with your totally unreasonable right wing views.

Ah, if he had a brain he'd be dangerous.....

[Imran Siddiqui]

Isn't the hole you are digging deep enough for you to keep plugging the shovel further and further?

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Agathon


Oh dear - did you take that literally? I guess so...

I thought the piece about Albertans blaming the Liberals for the poor performance of their NHL teams would have been enough to establish the intended tone.

Can never tell with bigots.

[Agathon]

Is that really the best either of you can manage?

[Asher]

If I say "No" can you tell me whether I mean it or not?

[Imran Siddiqui]

Asher:

[Agathon]

'tis a different thing. I thought you would have done the liar paradox in the logic class you hated so much, Asher.

Calgary 2, San Jose 3. Looks like the Flames are being punished by the hockey gods for Thursday night's impudence.

Anyway, the Liar Paradox:

http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/p/par-liar.htm

[Asher]

I know it's a different thing, but it's parallel structure.

The liar paradox is one of the things I laughed at in the logic classes. It's one of the things the philosophy students found profound and everyone else chanted "DUH!".