Rape Humor

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Tuomerehu
Immediatly when somebody which you haven't seen before appears, he's a DL! Great work, guys!

Settlers in the OT are guilty until proven innocent.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Gibsie

I find statements like, "In other words the idea of someone being innocent until proven guilty and the requirement for a decent amount of evidence have gone out the window when it comes to rape" quite baffling really; perhaps the legal systems of the US are the total opposite of the UK, but considering less than 10% of rape accusations actually lead to someone being charged in Britain, and then less than 10% of those cases lead to a conviction, I think it's safe to say this is one instance in which "innocent until proven guilty" if firmly entrenched in the law.

My cases were from New Zealand and all within the last 7 years. The main one was at a university where there is added pressure to do something about sexual assault.

Well if that many rape accusations are thrown out for lack of evidence that's fine with me - I only object to innocent people being hounded (no matter how many times the opposite is the case).

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Tuomerehu


How nice to see open-minded people here!

I find "open-minded" to be a really bad choice of words when defending juhani_kahvi, considering he just posted a "comic" where a girl gets raped for something she has on her shirt (which is, I believe, ment to be a metaphore for an idealogy).

[RGBVideo]

Settlers in the OT are guilty until proven innocent.

Care to read my post again?

This guy has been in the OTF before, he has posted a lot in here before.
He has his own homepages which are linked in his sig, there he uses his own nick.

Sheesh.

[Az]

oh gawd... Tuomerehu. I used 'DL' as a slur.

"better take the link off, *******"

Is that better?

[Dr Strangelove]

Originally posted by Calc II


I get an erection just by looking at a ball go into a golf hole... I'm sure with a constant friction you could get a man to get erection.

I'm going to have to write your case up and send it to the American Psychiatric Association. as I don't think that we have a formal name for this particular type of paraphilia (fetish). Do we have any latin scholars who can tell me the latin name for a golf hole?

EDIT: On a more serious note, copntradictory? not really. What about raised heartbeat, increase in hormone activity etc etc?

Erection of the penis requires the relaxation of muscles in the walls of the arteries leading to the corpus cavernosae of the penis, opening up the arteries, while the dorsal vein of the penis closes, thus allowing blood to pool in the corpus cavernosae. When you are afraid the very opposite happens, the artery narrows and the vein opens up.
The corpus cavernosae are a pair of cylindrical structures forming the bulk of the shaft of the penis. If you transectioned the shaft of the penis perpendicular to its long axis you'd see that each corpus cavernosum has a central artery surrounded by a mass of blood sinuses, and a tough dense outer sheath.

OK, when I mentioned dissecting the penis what exactly happened to yours? Tell the truth, it went limp didn't it? See what I mean?

Anyone whose penis did the opposite please see me after class.........big boy.

[juhani_kahvi]

This experience and some additional information I received in Suomithreadi tells me that this is a lot more conservative forum than I remembered. I will refrain from posting anything scary in the future.

[Az]

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by juhani_kahvi
This experience and some additional information I received in Suomithreadi tells me that this is a lot more conservative forum than I remembered. I will refrain from posting anything scary in the future.

Actually... it's a site which allows anyone over 13 to post on it. It is also a site where people with families may be viewing threads in family areas of their homes. Not wanting to expose young people to material inappropriate for their age has little to do with conservatism and a lot to do with being responsible.

[juhani_kahvi]

There are a lot of forums with similar definitions (anyone over 13 can post) but where nobody would threaten me if I posted something like that.
Besides, I cannot see how seeing genitals could harm children. Of course seeing violence and murder DOES harm children, but that's not the point. If the comic strip had featured only a couple of murders, nobody would have cared. Violence, illogically, is acceptable, but pictures with sex are not. I think this is conservatism.
And anyway, I won't post this kind of things in the future, so perhaps we could stop brawling and get back to the point.

[notyoueither]

Good point re the point, but I suspect the mods would likewise edit out some of the results of violence which can be found on somethingrotten. At least I hope they would.

Anyways, here's some links for you Doc:

http://www.survivingtothriving.org/malesurvivors

http://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:2N4NSkgYbicC:www.vix.com/men/rape/how2rapeman.html+%27man+raped%27&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

http://www.eightballmagazine.com/diatribes/volume01/diatribes030/diatribes605-625/diatribes621.htm

I don't know how good that last one is.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

There is a hell of a lot of difference between the No, kiss, no, kiss, yes scenario and the rape scenario which is NO, NO, NO.

The first scenario may not be as bad, but is still reprehensible conduct.

Making out is reprehensible? Haven't you ever made out with a woman who was more than willing to go only so far?

Now what if she changes her mind after becoming sufficiently aroused?

In other words, she said no, she said no, she said yes.

[Thorn]

Back on topic, I know most of you have joked about rape and probably haven't even thought a thing about it (male rape). Prison rape is seen as the norm and as something that people can make fun of.

A lot of the people in prison have STDs including AIDS, so being raped by one could be a death sentence, now if that isn't bad tell me what is?

Rape with women though it can hurt a lot goes a lot more smoothly then rape with a man, most men's ass's are very tight and lack lubrication (like women's vagina's) and raping them forcing a blunt object in them rapidily without preparation tears the skin and cause you to bleed like hell and intense pain equal to that of sticking a knife up your ass. How come this never gets any attention?

[Agathon]

The problem with "No means no" is a legal problem in that it is often supposed by feminists to be a sufficient criterion to be the sole determinant of whether informed consent has been given. I think this view is too restrictive - the context needs to be taken into account (as it does with all normal speech acts).

Here's something to look at anyway - the Berkowitz case on p. 2 is interesting.

http://www.themenscenter.com/mensight/Library/femjuris.htm

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Agathon
The problem with "No means no" is a legal problem in that it is often supposed by feminists to be a sufficient criterion to be the sole determinant of whether informed consent has been given.

There's no problem with "no means no," except for people who don't want to be constrained in their quest for sex and power. It's not a hard or inconvenient rule of thumb. Why do men so vigorously resist simple decency, cuz it's not women who protest the rule? I always told people that if they said no, I'd take them at their word, and go no further. Maybe I didn't get as much sex as I could have, but at least I'm not a rapist.