An explanation I never found satisfactory. He is basicly saying they were allowed to commit a wrong because they were bad people.
clearly you have a problem with both Jesus and Paul, not just Paul. It is dishonest to reject Paul as not conforming with Christianity, when you don't accept Jesus.
It makes sense to me that God will not provide everything all at once, and rather progressively reveal himself to man. This is part of the point of the Mosaic Law, that you teach to the level at which people can understand. If you change their behavior for the better, have you not won part of the victory?
You ignored my points about equality, that Paul taught the equality of all persons, which is anathema to slavery as an institution.
Did he ask that a friend be freed? Apparently.
"I appeal to you for my son Onesimus, who became my son while I was in chains."
What does Paul mean when he refers to Onesimus as 'my son?'
Does he mean a friend, or does he mean a brother in Christ? I think he means the latter. Onesimus is not just a personal friend of Paul, but he is also a Christian brother, under the pastoral care of Paul.
By extension, Paul should be willing to file a claim for all the Christian brothers who are in chains to their masters, in asking for their freedom from captivity.
Now combine this with Paul's earlier statement. In order for a slave to be freed, he can stay as he is and not improve his lot, or he can become a Christian, and have people to fight for his freedom like Paul.
Paul has no power to demand the release of all the slaves, but he does have the power to help the Christians.
How was a slave to "get free" while being a good slave and doing your master's bidding? By being freed by the master only.
It does not prove that Paul condones slavery, Paul was trying to topple slavery from within.
If you take the slaves away from a slaveowner, he will simply get more. If you convince the slaveowner that slavery is wrong, then he will never own another slave, and release the ones he owns. Which is more effective? The first might charge out of the gate, but the second overtakes and eventually surpasses the first.
Comment