OK Pro-Abortionists...Case Study.

[flash9286]

A human- when a cell has human dna

[loinburger]

Originally posted by flash9286
A human- when a cell has human dna

You'd better not cut yourself or suffer any similar injury, then, because otherwise you'll end up murdering thousands or millions of tiny little humans (also known as "red blood cells").

[tinyp3nis]

Originally posted by loinburger


You'd better not cut yourself or suffer any similar injury, then, because otherwise you'll end up murdering thousands or millions of tiny little humans (also known as "red blood cells").

And I can have a child if I cut my finger off and start to take care of it! Or is it my twin since it is a part of me? No wait, then it must be a woman! Then my finger will eat an apple and I get kicked out of my cool appartment "just because".

[flash9286]

ok if you want to be spepfic
Human- when two human sex cells fuse to form human

[loinburger]

Originally posted by flash9286
Human- when two human sex cells fuse to form human

We're allowed to define terms with no justification whatsoever now? Beauty!

Why not go the whole hog? Try:
Abortion- The act of murdering babies.

"Clearly, abortion is murder! Just look at the definition, for crying out loud!"

[flash9286]

just giving my opinon you have yet to back up your arugments

[loinburger]

Originally posted by flash9286
just giving my opinon you have yet to back up your arugments

You're one to accuse others of not backing up their arguments...

"This is how I define a human, I offer no justifications for this definition but expect it to be accepted nonetheless, I thus declare victory by reason of my completely irrational (and thus irrefutable!) arguments."

If you want to offer a reasonable argument for your position, then I'll consider debating you. If you just want to throw around unjustified claims, then forget it -- you can do that with or without my assistance, and "debating" with you would be a waste of my time.

[flash9286]

me not justifinying what i said all you have done is pick apart other people posts you have presented no evidence of any kind an until you do i will leave this arugment

[loinburger]

Hey, it's no skin off my nose if you're content with having a completely arbitrary moral system.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by loinburger
You'd better not cut yourself or suffer any similar injury, then, because otherwise you'll end up murdering thousands or millions of tiny little humans (also known as "red blood cells").

Minor nitpick:

Human red blood cells do not have nucleus, so they don't have the human genes.

However, skin cells do have nucleus, and so do white blood cells.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by flash9286
ok if you want to be spepfic
Human- when two human sex cells fuse to form human

So what's the difference between a fertilised egg and your average skill cell?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Sirotnikov

Would a woman with a 5 y/o be allowed to let him smoke and drink alcohol? No - social services would take the kid away.

I was given wine with meals from the age of 4. No problem.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

The answer to the original question is easy, and boils down to a swingle question. Do the rights of the unborn child take precedence over the rights of the mother?

I say they don't. Therefore I don't propose that smoking mothers should be prosecuted. Nor do I propose prosecuting pregnant women who fail to ingest sufficient folic acid, for that matter.

[KrazyHorse]

Ron, drinking/abusing other drugs to the extent of causing a major health risk to the child if pregnancy is carried to term is unjustifiable for the same reason that firing off random shots with a rifle in the dark is unjustifiable.

By your actions (now) you may cause concrete harm to a person (later). It doesn't matter that the person doesn't yet exist when the act is undertaken...

[MrFun]

I think pro-choice and pro-life people could all get along if they would share clean combs with one another.