Originally posted by Kramsib
At least a good reasoning from Boris godunov.
At least a good reasoning from Boris godunov.
What is moral? Too complicated philosophic discussion about morality, even morality has changed through ages.
What about those cows which spent all their lives being breed to die for giving us meat living in a tiny room? CLAUSTROPHOBIC TORTURE, What about those hens which have their "turns" alterated to produce more eggs? METHABOLIST MANIPULATION
Human beings make terrible things against animals to keep our lifestyles "****ting" on moral values. Don't make me laugh !.
The aim of "Banderillas" is to "tease" the bull, their hooks are only to fix on the top of the bull. The pike is to make the bull bleed and rest energy to the bull.
These are the real facts, you think they are cruel. Well, I know, I think they are unnecesary, I prefer the lonely fight between the bull and the Torero. The pike is painfull but I think the bull doesn't feel the Banderillas no more than the time when they are stuck. It is a big and a strong animal, remember that.
But the definitive reasoning is, if there is no bullfighting the specie Lidia Bull will dissapear irremediably.
I repeat, if you don't believe me look for what happened to the donkeys everywhere.
What is more cruel, the killing of some animals or the dissapearing of the whole specie?
And then who would be the worst murderers?
I repeat, if you don't believe me look for what happened to the donkeys everywhere.
What is more cruel, the killing of some animals or the dissapearing of the whole specie?
And then who would be the worst murderers?
So yes, the worse murderers would still be the Toreros.
Comment