Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does Pi contain my phone number.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by orange


    would you say the same about 10100100010000100000......?
    randomness implies that all possibilities are equally likely; 0-9. A truely random number would have both random pattern and distribution of the digits 0-9. You are artificially limiting 'infinite patterns' to predictable distribution.

    Comment


    • #62
      ok wait
      when i said repeat itself i didnt say it properly
      im not saying pi contains pi i meant that pi will contain a repetion of any finite length u want
      and that string of 0 and 1 orange will be contained an infinite number of times in pi if it is written in decimal OR binary

      Comment


      • #63
        yeah but since pi can be written as the limit of a series shouldn't there be a way to predict exactly where my phone number, or any other number will appear?
        I'm 49% Apathetic, 23% Indifferent, 46% Redundant, 26% Repetative and 45% Mathetically Deficient.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by LulThyme
          ok wait
          when i said repeat itself i didnt say it properly
          im not saying pi contains pi i meant that pi will contain a repetion of any finite length u want
          and that string of 0 and 1 orange will be contained an infinite number of times in pi if it is written in decimal OR binary
          Here's where I lose some of you.

          I can understand if you say that it's possible for any finite string of numbers ( decimal or otherwise... ) to exist within pi, but to say that it must exist AND that it must exist an infinite amount of times sounds a little kooky to me.

          Just because pi is random doesn't mean that EVERYTHING must occur within it.

          For example: assuming the Universe is infinitely large, would you guarantee that there are an infinite amount of planets exactly like Earth within the Universe?

          I'd say no, but from the sounds of things, simply because the Universe is infinite, you would make that guarantee.
          "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
          You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

          "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

          Comment


          • #65
            Since we are on the topic of random and infinite numbers:

            You know that theory that states 'if you take a room full of monkeys, and give them each a typewriter, eventually (given an infinite amount of time) they will write a novel'? Another way to put it is to take a random number generator and infinite time: eventually, it will generate every number pattern possible... eventually.

            The theory actually disproves itself.

            Take an infinite number of random number generators; according to this theory (given infinite time to look for it), you will eventually find one that never produces the number '7'. So how can that particular number generator ever fulfill the theory?

            Comment


            • #66
              could it be possible to generate an algorithm or something to determine where a particular finite string of numbers will appear... and since it must appear an infinite number of times could it be written as a function?

              then again what do i know...
              I'm 49% Apathetic, 23% Indifferent, 46% Redundant, 26% Repetative and 45% Mathetically Deficient.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Caesar the Great
                yeah but since pi can be written as the limit of a series shouldn't there be a way to predict exactly where my phone number, or any other number will appear?
                Because prediction relies on order. If the order is not predictable... no prediction is possible. You could do a proof with a probability, but that would be different from an exact prediction.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Slow down a bit, LulThyme... Let's assume two series of figures: First, some randomly chosen one, let's say 576456234. Second, all the numbers before some given point in the approximation of pi. Now, you say that the first has to be repeated infinitely many times in pi - in the second case, you say that it can only be repeated finitely.

                  * thinks *

                  Ah, of course, figured it out myself. In the first case we're speaking about occurrences - in the second case, repeats. Different things.
                  This is Shireroth, and Giant Squid will brutally murder me if I ever remove this link from my signature | In the end it won't be love that saves us, it will be mathematics | So many people have this concept of God the Avenger. I see God as the ultimate sense of humor -- SlowwHand

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by orange


                    Here's where I lose some of you.

                    I can understand if you say that it's possible for any finite string of numbers ( decimal or otherwise... ) to exist within pi, but to say that it must exist AND that it must exist an infinite amount of times sounds a little kooky to me.

                    Just because pi is random doesn't mean that EVERYTHING must occur within it.

                    For example: assuming the Universe is infinitely large, would you guarantee that there are an infinite amount of planets exactly like Earth within the Universe?

                    I'd say no, but from the sounds of things, simply because the Universe is infinite, you would make that guarantee.
                    is not NECESSARILY true that the universe is infinite. It may be. Then again, maybe its finite.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      orange... that depends wether you mean space itself or matter? if there is only a finite ammount of matter there may only be 1 planet like earth, but with an infinite ammount of matter (which creates all kinds of problems) there would have to be an infinite number of planets exactly like earth, not to mention an infinite number of planets with an extra oxygen molecule and an infinite number of planets with an extra nitrogen molecule etc....
                      I'm 49% Apathetic, 23% Indifferent, 46% Redundant, 26% Repetative and 45% Mathetically Deficient.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by MrBaggins
                        is not NECESSARILY true that the universe is infinite. It may be. Then again, maybe its finite.
                        I said that it was an assumption for my analogy. I never made the claim that the universe actually is infinite.

                        For example: assuming the Universe is infinitely large, would you guarantee that there are an infinite amount of planets exactly like Earth within the Universe?
                        "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                        You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                        "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Caesar the Great
                          orange... that depends wether you mean space itself or matter? if there is only a finite ammount of matter there may only be 1 planet like earth, but with an infinite ammount of matter (which creates all kinds of problems) there would have to be an infinite number of planets exactly like earth, not to mention an infinite number of planets with an extra oxygen molecule and an infinite number of planets with an extra nitrogen molecule etc....
                          only if formation of matter worked to include dupes... its possible that such a universe would have infinite variation too.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Caesar the Great
                            orange... that depends wether you mean space itself or matter? if there is only a finite ammount of matter there may only be 1 planet like earth, but with an infinite ammount of matter (which creates all kinds of problems) there would have to be an infinite number of planets exactly like earth, not to mention an infinite number of planets with an extra oxygen molecule and an infinite number of planets with an extra nitrogen molecule etc....
                            Why?
                            "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                            You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                            "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Caesar the Great
                              orange... that depends wether you mean space itself or matter? if there is only a finite ammount of matter there may only be 1 planet like earth, but with an infinite ammount of matter (which creates all kinds of problems) there would have to be an infinite number of planets exactly like earth, not to mention an infinite number of planets with an extra oxygen molecule and an infinite number of planets with an extra nitrogen molecule etc....
                              No, there is no proof of that; see my post about the monkeys a few paces back.

                              And there is no such thing as random anyhow; the system generating the randomness determines the pattern.

                              That's how high-tech crooks can win at digital Keno everytime. And it is also true in nature.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                i'll assume there has to be
                                I'm 49% Apathetic, 23% Indifferent, 46% Redundant, 26% Repetative and 45% Mathetically Deficient.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X