18year old paddled at school

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous


Whether you agree with it or not...uh, not agreeing with it leads to LAWS CHANGING.

If enough people don't agree with it, it will be changed.

Huh...I guess that backs up Asher's argument

FYI, I didn't know before today it was legal.

I simply assumed it wasn't. But then, I don't need a law to tell me not to beat kids.

Apparently, most states do. That's a shame as well.

ACK!

[Asher]

Originally posted by Tuberski
But then, I don't need a law to tell me not to beat kids.

Apparently, most states do. That's a shame as well.

ACK!

I don't need a law to tell me not to put tar in my lungs.

Apparently, most people do. That's a shame as well.

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by Dissident


why is gay sex disgusting? It's only disgusting to people who have a secret yearning for it.

Oh let me clarify, I think men are ugly, so I don't see how a man can be attracted to a man.


Women are beautiful to me, so I can understand why women would be attracted to women.

Judgemental? Sure.

But not harmful.

ACK!

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Had a teacher attempted to beat me when I was 18, I'd have decked them. What's more, seeing as it would be self-defence, they could stick their lawsuits up their arses.

[Mrs. Tuberski]

Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
Well...even in massachusetts, we could leave school grounds at the age of 18...but we couldn't come back...

Which is one of my points If you want to drop out at that age you can. Its a dumb anology i know but the point is you dont need mommy and daddys permission anymore. Sowith that being said the girl shouldnt have been paddled since she didnt give the permission.

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by Asher

I don't need a law to tell me not to put tar in my lungs.

Apparently, most people do. That's a shame as well.

There are no laws telling me not to smoke, not one anywhere in the US.

70% or so, don't need that law to tell them not to smoke either. Doesn't make you a genius.

Does make me stupid however.

ACK!

[Sava]

I woulda punched that ****er in the face if he tried to paddle me.

That is definitely assault.

[Solver]

California state law:

Any person who, under circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any child to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering, or having the care or custody of any child, willfully causes or permits the person or health of that child to be injured, or willfully causes or permits that child to be placed in such a situation that its person or health is endangered, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years.

Notice the bold part. Laws that state anything about corporeal punishment are similar to that one, in using subjective terms such as "(un)justifiable", "(un)reasonable", etc. These are always open for interpretation by lawyers, jurors, judges, etc. So if a case is taken to court, then it may easily revolve around whether the specific corporeal punishment was "reasonable". Or here, specifically, whether punishment that caused these specific injuries that required a cast on an arm, etc., was reasonable under the circumstances.

[Mrs. Tuberski]

There was one other part that might not have made it to the article i posted and that being the princples saying that at this school, uses old school discpline they wear uniforms and have to be tucked in, no kissing of any kind allowed, and boys are instructed to open doors and pull out the chairs of the female peers. what do you think of that?

[Ted Striker]

I think that's pretty cool.

And they call me a lefty commie on here.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski
There was one other part that might not have made it to the article i posted and that being the princples saying that at this school, uses old school discpline they wear uniforms and have to be tucked in, no kissing of any kind allowed, and boys are instructed to open doors and pull out the chairs of the female peers. what do you think of that?

I think if they force that kind of attitude, they should be teaching the women home-ec instead of calculus, to be consistent.

[Dis]

Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski
There was one other part that might not have made it to the article i posted and that being the princples saying that at this school, uses old school discpline they wear uniforms and have to be tucked in, no kissing of any kind allowed, and boys are instructed to open doors and pull out the chairs of the female peers. what do you think of that?

all the rules make sense except for the holding doors and pulling chairs for females. That's just sexist.

[Mrs. Tuberski]

And if i didnt mention it earlier this is the only school in bexar county which is all of sa to allow such punishment. and that 23 other states allow this type of punisment .

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by Asher

I think if they force that kind of attitude, they should be teaching the women home-ec instead of calculus, to be consistent.

That's just sexist. But a good point.



ACK!

[Asher]

Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski
And if i didnt mention it earlier this is the only school in bexar county which is all of sa to allow such punishment. and that 23 other states allow this type of punisment .

How much do you want to bet these are red states?