Tweet
I believe some of us conceeded earlier in this thread and we even blamed the candidate's loss upon the candidate.
-
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate. -
Both times.Originally posted by Sprayber
Perot spoiled thatTry http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
never mind me eithier then.Originally posted by Sprayber
never mind"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
I miss Perot.
I guess I miss Clinton and Bush I, as well...
KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!Comment
-
I bet the dems miss Clinton more than either of us do.Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
I miss Perot.
I guess I miss Clinton and Bush I, as well...
Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul TighComment
-
That's a safe bet.
KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!Comment
-
Ah come on Ming - this may be our Kuci, but it's not like dojoboy's post was anything but a bit of crowing anyway.Originally posted by Ming
Enough with the personal crap... keep it up and you are toast.Question: Who managed to post one of the most inane, useless questions ever?
Answer: dojoboy.
I thought it was a bit ridiculous myself.Comment
-
Votes, not percentage.Originally posted by Spiffor
Didn't Reagan get re-elected with 60% ? That sure beats Bush."What did you learn in school today, dear little boy of mine?
I learned our government must be strong. It's always right and never wrong,.....that's what I learned in school."
--- Tom Paxton song ('63)Comment
-
What Dojoboy posted was true... was it crowing... probably... but was he attacking anybody here... NO.[SIZE=1] Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
Ah come on Ming - this may be our Kuci, but it's not like dojoboy's post was anything but a bit of crowing anyway.
I thought it was a bit ridiculous myself.
Just because Kuci probably doesn't like the outcome of the election, doesn't mean he is allowed to make unprovoked attacks on Dojoboy... Again, attack the candidates, their stances, their mistakes, but NOT the posters.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Originally posted by Ming
Enough with the personal crap... keep it up and you are toast.Yea, I was doing a bit of crowing. I hope everyone knows I don't try and purposely incite people. Just a little fun.Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt Ah come on Ming - this may be our Kuci, but it's not like dojoboy's post was anything but a bit of crowing anyway.
I thought it was a bit ridiculous myself.
And, thanks Ming. Kuci really did hurt my feelings.
"What did you learn in school today, dear little boy of mine?
I learned our government must be strong. It's always right and never wrong,.....that's what I learned in school."
--- Tom Paxton song ('63)Comment
-
/me shrugsOriginally posted by Ming
What Dojoboy posted was true... was it crowing... probably... but was he attacking anybody here... NO.
Just because Kuci probably doesn't like the outcome of the election, doesn't mean he is allowed to make unprovoked attacks on Dojoboy... Again, attack the candidates, their stances, their mistakes, but NOT the posters.
Well, I've seen worse recently, and blatantly flaming someone rather than just pointing out how silly someone's post was, but, you're the one with the stick....Comment
-
I'm sure you have... However...Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
* MrWhereItsAt shrugs
Well, I've seen worse recently, and blatantly flaming someone rather than just pointing out how silly someone's post was, but, you're the one with the stick....
We don't see every post... that's just not possible... but we do see when people use the complaint feature...
Second... what you don't see is that some people are warned and even restricted via PM, and members aren't aware of action taken...
Third... We will be keeping a close eye on things to stop crap from getting personal today since emotions are running high...
And last... Kuci has involved himself in some personal attacks in the past and has been warned to not do them again.
Now back on topic...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
In a word, ****.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
You forgot the "yeah", Arrian...KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!Comment
-
Putting that behind...
Anyways, I read a rather disturbing article on our Sunday newspaper before this election. It was on who would be better for us (NZ) to win. Essentially, it predicted that, without the need to worry about ANY kind of support, amongst Americans or the international community, the Bush admin would continue to play tough - and not just on those perceived as enemies, but on those who had different stances than the US.
The case of note was NZ's nuclear free policy. We do not allow nuclear-powered ships or craft containing nuclear weapons into port here. Although personally I think this policy is a little out of date I am to a degree proud of the stance against such potentially dangerous technology. The article (although perhaps a little scaremongering) predicted that, should Bush remain, NZ would come to grief with the US on this innocent policy, incurring trade and diplomatic disincentives, rather than it being a non-issue, as it should be.
Does anyone else think this sort of thing will happen? That allies who happen to disagree on what I see are minor or surpassable issues should be shunned by the US?Comment
Comment