Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Well that's the end of rap music!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
    *sigh*

    I shouldn't even begin to discuss something with Asher who's repeatedly showed no understanding of what art is about whatsoever.

    But alright, I'll give it a go.

    Asher, you need to disavow yourself of the notion of the individual as the sole purveyor of creativity. In fact, loads of truly great music and art has grown forth in communities, with people making marginal improvements on each other's work, spurring each other on to do better things, competing and co-operating.

    Sampling allows you to experiment with the music of others, to expose portions of it, to see what it's like juxtaposed with other music, with new melodies and rhythms, to analyse it by taking it apart. The great hook baked into a slab of pompous crap is taken out, given fresh air, set apart with a new melody that fits it perfectly but that the first artist could never have come up with; together two generations have created a piece of music vastly superior to what either could do on their own.

    The Jamaican producer has created a riddim, true, but only if it's good enough will it get versioned by the leading Deejays, thus neatly cutting out all the crap. Each Deejay will produce a very different version of the song, his personal competition entry in the fierce dancehall market; only the best remain at the end. The music is vastly better than if one person had done it all the way through.

    The cut-up artist takes a familiar piece of music and changes its meaning completely simply by switching a few phrases around. The audience gets to think about the meaning of the music in an entirely different way from before, about what art is and what creativity is, about how music and genres and language works. As it inspires thought it is better than the original piece cut-up.

    A dance producer uses the sampler as an instrument, creating sounds quite unlike whatever originally went in. He has the entire world at his fingertips, every existing instrument, every potential instrument, and can from the most minute of building blocks create startling soundscapes that vastly outshine any of the tiny segments that went in.

    And so on.
    Except this is Rap we are talking about.......

    ACK!
    Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
      *sigh*

      I shouldn't even begin to discuss something with Asher who's repeatedly showed no understanding of what art is about whatsoever.

      But alright, I'll give it a go.

      Asher, you need to disavow yourself of the notion of the individual as the sole purveyor of creativity. In fact, loads of truly great music and art has grown forth in communities, with people making marginal improvements on each other's work, spurring each other on to do better things, competing and co-operating.

      Sampling allows you to experiment with the music of others, to expose portions of it, to see what it's like juxtaposed with other music, with new melodies and rhythms, to analyse it by taking it apart. The great hook baked into a slab of pompous crap is taken out, given fresh air, set apart with a new melody that fits it perfectly but that the first artist could never have come up with; together two generations have created a piece of music vastly superior to what either could do on their own.

      The Jamaican producer has created a riddim, true, but only if it's good enough will it get versioned by the leading Deejays, thus neatly cutting out all the crap. Each Deejay will produce a very different version of the song, his personal competition entry in the fierce dancehall market; only the best remain at the end. The music is vastly better than if one person had done it all the way through.

      The cut-up artist takes a familiar piece of music and changes its meaning completely simply by switching a few phrases around. The audience gets to think about the meaning of the music in an entirely different way from before, about what art is and what creativity is, about how music and genres and language works. As it inspires thought it is better than the original piece cut-up.

      A dance producer uses the sampler as an instrument, creating sounds quite unlike whatever originally went in. He has the entire world at his fingertips, every existing instrument, every potential instrument, and can from the most minute of building blocks create startling soundscapes that vastly outshine any of the tiny segments that went in.

      And so on.
      How many of the rappers, or rippers as some here would call them. do it for the art? More about the bling than art
      Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Tuberski
        All started with Vanilla Ice ripping off Under Pressure.
        It started long before that. Ever listend to Sugar Hill?
        Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by General Ludd
          They aren't stealing it, they're editing cuting it, modifying it, and splicing it to the point where it does not resemble the original.
          That's bull****, and an extreme case.

          Take the riff in Vanilla Ice's "Ice, Ice Baby" and tell me it doesn't resemble "Under Pressure".

          If I where a huge computer geek, I would probably make a comment about microsoft 'stealing' windows from apple.
          If Microsoft stole the Apple logo and changed its color, that's still stealing -- and it's still not creative.
          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by chegitz guevara


            It started long before that. Ever listend to Sugar Hill?
            Nope, none of the others mentioned got the airplay of Vanilla Ice.

            ACK!
            Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Asher
              Sampling, by definition, is not creative...
              BS. Taking to different pieces of art and combining them into something new is very much creative. Just because a collage is aural doesn't mean it isn't art.
              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Asher
                Why is it idiotic to find it illegal for them to steal other people's music without their permission?
                Because previous court decisions said it was legal to sample a certain small amount of work.
                Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                Comment


                • #38
                  Yeah, I don't agree with sample not being creative. Same could be said about dj.ing, or turntablism. Most people say it's not an instrument, decks, I feel they are. Most people will change their minds when they hear awesome beatjuggling. It's not the same as HS disco djs.
                  In da butt.
                  "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
                  THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
                  "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
                    *sigh*

                    I shouldn't even begin to discuss something with Asher who's repeatedly showed no understanding of what art is about whatsoever.

                    But alright, I'll give it a go.

                    Asher, you need to disavow yourself of the notion of the individual as the sole purveyor of creativity.
                    Stopped reading right there. You're wrong from the very premise.

                    Someone writes a riff that is both well-known and catchy. Take, for example, the "Under Pressure" riff. Horribly, embarassingly bad rap "artist" takes this riff and talks about nothing over it. The catchiest and most well-known part of this song, arguably the main reason it did so well, is the riff that was stolen from another artist.

                    You're arguing that this is creative, I'm saying it's theft. He's welcome to do it, he just needs permission from the original artist.

                    It's very simple, and it has ****-all to do with your horrible fascination with this crap that is "art", and more to do with legal responsibilities.
                    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      They're trying to create as good music as possible. They're building on the successes of others because the music becomes better that way.

                      *shrug*

                      I don't particularly care about the individual members of the creative process and their respective inputs, only the end result. Re-using recorded material (whether in dance, rap, jamaican dancehall or whatever, as dub or versioning or sampling or cut-up) is a very good way to make music as good as possible.
                      Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
                      Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                        BS. Taking to different pieces of art and combining them into something new is very much creative. Just because a collage is aural doesn't mean it isn't art.
                        And to make a collage using copyrighted images requires permission of the originator of the images.

                        QED.
                        "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                        Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Game. Set. Match.

                          ACK!
                          Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Sprayber
                            How many of the rappers, or rippers as some here would call them. do it for the art? More about the bling than art
                            That's true for every type of art. Do you think Thomas Kincaid paints for the art or the bling? The fact that his paintings are the painted equivalent of elevator music on prozac doesn't stop it from being the most popular paintings in the U.S. Most rock musicians are i it for the money and not the creativity. But there are some few geniuses who do it for the music.
                            Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Pekka
                              Yeah, I don't agree with sample not being creative. Same could be said about dj.ing, or turntablism. Most people say it's not an instrument, decks, I feel they are. Most people will change their minds when they hear awesome beatjuggling. It's not the same as HS disco djs.
                              I don't consider it sampling when they significantly modify the work, but when it's a blatant, verbatim ripoff I consider it sampling.

                              People who scratch/mutilate/etc are fine, since it's not the same material by that point. When all you do is take an unmodified portion of a song and repeat it, that is theft.
                              "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                              Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Asher

                                Stopped reading right there.
                                Oh for ****'s sake read the rest of the post. How am I supposed to argue with you if you're not even reading what I write?

                                Anyway, like I said, **** property and **** the law.
                                Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
                                Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X