Originally posted by KrazyHorse
I remember the good old days, when if you quoted somebody and editted the quote they would realise that you had done so, and ask themselves why.
If it turned out that only two words needed to be editted and the quote would serve equally well as an argument for the other side then they would retire to reconsider their position, and perhaps comes tto the conclusion that it was untenable.
I remember the good old days, when if you quoted somebody and editted the quote they would realise that you had done so, and ask themselves why.
If it turned out that only two words needed to be editted and the quote would serve equally well as an argument for the other side then they would retire to reconsider their position, and perhaps comes tto the conclusion that it was untenable.
Comment