"Isn't she a little young?"

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Spiffor
You're banned? That's strange, I never heard of it, and we thought it was you who felt bored with the place. I'll ask.

Yup.

(notice: if you try to go to Eventis for the first time in a week or so, know the server has utterly and entirely crashed, and we began back to zero - you need to create an account anew)

Yeah, this is what I was banned from, after I registered.

[Drogue]

Kuci: You're not banned. However skywalker, kuciwalker and kucinich are all unregistered, so I presume registration didn't work.

[Kuciwalker]

...

[Last Conformist]

What's your login name?

[Kuciwalker]

weeelll...

[Last Conformist]

Thing is, the userlist does not list any "Kucinich", "Kuciwalker", "skywalker" or anything else identifiable as you.

[Adagio]

/me quickly drops in, goes off-topic:

Try to re-register

Try to do this talk via pm's instead

/me leaves the thread to never come back...

[Kuciwalker]

How about "Ming"?

EDIT: xpost

EDIT: "MarkG"

[Snowflake]

He's the MarkG.

[Kuciwalker]

Oh yeah, I forgot which. Sorry

[Snowflake]

They are badmouthing you. Better log in and check.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
YOU BASTARD!
I always suspected you can from a town of baby rapers!

Hey, I was 16 and I did my best. I suspect I'm infertile....

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by HongHu
They are badmouthing you. Better log in and check.

Did you not notice the SS I posted?

[Ben Kenobi]

Personally I concur, but my argument hinges on a definition of "minor". See above.

Fair enough.

That is not to say that I am advocating that girls of X age have sex. I am saying that if they want to and are capable of doing so and deciding, then I see no reason why not.

But there is no difference between your statement, and saying that girls of that age should be able to have sex.

But to define vulnerable is not to specify an age where one is vulnerable then immediately not. What is so different between 15 years 11 months and 16 years 1 month?

Very clever! Using a favourite tactic of mine against me.

Is there any substantial difference between someone of 15 years, and 11 months, and between someone of 16 years? Not really. Yet there is a large difference between someone who is 18, and someone who is 14.

Personally, I'd rather raise the age to 18, since you would be looking at whether a person at that age would be able to deal with all the consequences of pregnancy. You would err on the side of caution, since it is better to protect someone from harm, then it is worse to make them wait a year or two.

[Spiffor]

Personally, I'd rather raise the age to 18

Why am I not suprised?