Tweet
this is also a better ship... also on a better show...
-
Last edited by Al B. Sure!; May 29, 2004, 14:58."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi -
Size constraints limited me.Originally posted by joncha
It would be cooler if Reagan was more... subliminal. You could also add a "Vote GOP" slide in there, too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verto
All your racoon are belong to The Reagan.
It's spelled raccoon -- not racoon.
But at least now you won the award for ugliest avatar.
A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.Comment
-
Every now and then I think it's nice to give you a bone to chew.Comment
-
Stargate SG-1 is a fantastic show, better than either of the other "Star" franchises. It's an example of how to correctly run a sci-fi franchise.
By the way, the Go'auld are incompetant idiots. It's even said so on the show, especially with regards to the small arms;
Origionally said by Colonel O'Neill
This is a weapon of Terror! It is meant to Intimidate!
*puts down staff weapon, holds up P90*
This is a weapon of War! It is meant to Kill!Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
I enjoyed the movie, but the series really bites.
The only redeeming factor is Pierre Bernard's bit on Conan O'Brien.Attached Files~ If Tehben spits eggs at you, jump on them and throw them back. ~ Eventis ~ Eventis Dungeons & Dragons 6th Age Campaign: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4: (Unspeakable) Horror on the Hill ~Comment
-
-
The series is great, better than the movie.Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
Stargate is a "star" franchize. I can`t disapprove your claims about series since I haven`t watched it but movie really sucked. 
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
Holy ****, someone has waaaaay too much time on his hands. This stuff is insane.
But in spite of the supreme geekiness displayed by that site, there are some cool pics:
Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012
When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - RahComment
-
For me, B5 had superior plot lines, and far far more consistency, if only becuase it was always one sotry laid out form the start while Trek shows are episodic, and any long storylines in general eventually fall apart. DS9 was actually better able to fight this becuase it is centered in one place and not about a ship roaming out there in the universe.
B5 in general was closer to scientific reality than the other two- not perfetc, but certainly closer. SW does not even try, since it is scif fi only in the whole "set in space" part, but otherwise is fantasy really.
At a minimum, B5 has more believeable soldiers who actually exist in a chain of command.If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard ShawComment
-
Originally posted by obstructor
Stargate is a "star" franchize. I can`t disapprove your claims about series since I haven`t watched it but movie really sucked.
Originally posted by Lonestar
Stargate SG-1 is a fantastic show, better than either of the other "Star" franchises. It's an example of how to correctly run a sci-fi franchiseToday, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
What is it to hmmm for. I just teased you about the star part. I haven`t watched the series so I didn`t comment it (only the movie ).
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
Here's how I rank the sci-fi tv shows:
brilliant
1. Farscape
2. Babylon 5
solid entertainment
3. Star Trek: The Next Generation
4. Star Trek (original series)
5. Red Dwarf
6. Star Trek Enterprise
has it's moments
7. Dr. Who
8. Battlestar Galactica
9. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
consistently painful
10. Andromeda
11. Star Trek: Voyager
worse than Walker: Texas Ranger
12. Stargate: SG-1
Note that this doesn't include shows that didn't last more than one season (including mini-series), animated series or shows that I haven't watched more than 2 or 3 complete episodes of.
edited to clarify rankings
Last edited by joncha; May 29, 2004, 15:59.~ If Tehben spits eggs at you, jump on them and throw them back. ~ Eventis ~ Eventis Dungeons & Dragons 6th Age Campaign: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4: (Unspeakable) Horror on the Hill ~Comment
-
Your list isn't bad, but I'd just drop everything after Farscape.Originally posted by joncha
Here's how I rank the sci-fi tv shows:
1. Farscape
2. Babylon 5
3. Star Trek: The Next Generation
4. Star Trek (original series)
5. Red Dwarf
6. Star Trek Enterprise
7. Dr. Who
8. Battlestar Galactica
9. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
10. Andromeda
11. Star Trek: Voyager
12. Stargate: SG-1
Note that this doesn't include shows that didn't last more than one season (including mini-series), animated series or shows that I haven't watched more than 2 or 3 complete episodes of.Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse
Do It OurselvesComment
-
You rank SG1 below Voyager, Enterprise, Andromeda, and TNG? What the Hell is your Problem??
Oh wait...right...communist.Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
Comment