Socialist claim victory in Spain

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by NeOmega


I thought you were leaving.

Too bad Anzar decided war was a god thing, or your friend might still have his leg today. How many Iraqi friends of your's lost their legs this year?

Your are pretty arrogant. Your also pretty pathetic. Anybody who is against the Iraqi liberation is arrogant and don't look at the bigger picture. You don't even dare try to accuse Aznar of this... you are no better than the Al Qaeda spokesperson on that tape. You cannot even spell Aznar's name right.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Ned
The Templar, I think the left is blinded by their hatred of Bush so much that they will even cut the legs out from the war on terror if somehow that gets Bush out of office.

Scenario I: George W. Bush, president of United States, refuses Taliban offer to hand over Bin Laden and replace them with the Northern Alliance, a despised organization that was thrown away by the people of Afghanistan (believe it or not, the Northern Alliance is considered worse than the Taliban).

Same W. Bush attacks Iraq on false premises, perfectly knowing that pictures of dismembered children will inundate Al-Jazeera viewers. Iraq becomes a fiasco, and it is increasingly looking like America will leave it to its fate, though it obviously will build its oil wells.
During this time, he does nothing to resolve the Palestinian conflict.

Muslim fundamentalism rises. Bin Laden gets new recruits and is pleased.

Scenario II: Mr X, liberal president of the United States, accepts Taliban offer to hand over Bin Laden, and announces new humanitarian cooperation project to show his commitement towards building friendly ties.

Meanwhile, he uses his diplomatic force to lead an international initiative towards solving the Palestinian conflict. Recognizing the possible threat Iraq could present, he builds a multilateral coalition determined to enforce the WMD ban against Hussein.

Which one is most likely to help fundamentalist sentiment in the Muslim world?

This al Qaeda attack was specifically directed at Spain to fracture the Coalition and to drive Spain out of Iraq.

No. The effects of the attack were quite unexpected. In most countries (including America), the bombing would have helped the right, not the left.

[Drake Tungsten]

I think we need a "Fake Boris-verse" to serve as a counterpart to the Nedaverse. Only another alternate reality can explain the "facts" in that last post...

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Giancarlo
My friend was almost killed in the Madrid attacks. I just found out he lost his leg.

I sincerely hope he wasn't insured and had to borrow money to pay for his healthcare.

Universal healthcare suxxors d00d!

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
I think we need a "Fake Boris-verse" to serve as a counterpart to the Nedaverse. Only another alternate reality can explain the "facts" in that last post...

You didn't know that the Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden, didn't you? Yeah, that's serious.

And what Israel would do if the US threatened to withdraw all diplomatic and military support?

Oh, did I mention that America had no possibility at all to work multilaterally in the case of Iraq?

[Drake Tungsten]

Yeah, that's serious.

Yeah, it is...

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Yeah, that's serious.

Yeah, it is...

Watch something else than Fox News, you ****ing dumbass. The Taliban were not dumb enough to lose their throne. They were willing to cooperate.

[Drake Tungsten]

[Fake Boris]

Dude I feel sorry for you.

[Fake Boris]

Here it is:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,575593,00.html

[Drake Tungsten]

The feeling is mutual, I assure you.

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


I sincerely hope he wasn't insured and had to borrow money to pay for his healthcare.

Universal healthcare suxxors d00d!

That is a real sick attitude to display when talking about one of my friends.

Boris, if that article is true about Bin Laden. Well I hope we take the opportunity if this guy is in fact telling the truth.

[joncha]

Other Boris:

1) That comment about Fezcarlo's friend unnecessarily cruel. Unless his friend was Hitler or Franco, which in this case I sincerely doubt. You should probably apologize. Seriously.

2) You made a good argument in your post about how a hypothetical liberal president would handle things post-911. I'm not sure, however, how "liberal" a Gore/Lieberman White House would be.

3) I'd like to see some sources on the Taliban claim. Since there's no reason to believe it a except general distrust of George W, back it up or (if shown to be empty) it's just more ammo for the Neds and Fezcarlos of the world to use against you, and by extention, the rest of us who oppose Bush's warmongering.

jon.

[Urban Ranger]

Post limit reached.