Theben,
OK, but the reign of Mansa Musa was during the 14th Century, which was much earlier than the bulk of the slave trade - at least, the European slave trade. Arabs and Africans were trading slaves around at that point amongst each other.
Although, this brings up an interesting side point. You know what happened to the kingdom of Mali? Well, after Mansa Musa made his wealth (and kingdom) known, Mali began appearing on maps in the Middle East and Europe. By the 16th Century, Mali was known as Songhai, a kingdom that was ultimately destroyed when the more modern Moroccan army invaded.
Point is, your example of a wealthy African kingdom - which I grant you, certainly existed - was wiped out by fighting with other African nations, and the trade routes that had brought the region prosperity were wiped out as well. You can't really blame Europeans for that one
Undoubtedly so. I don't deny either point for a single second. I also don't deny that slavery was morally wrong. My issue is with people who feel that, without slavery, they would be better off living in Africa. Regardless of how prosperous Africa might or might not have become, it is hard for me to envision ANY African nation rising to the level of the United States, or, for that matter, any other current First World country.
That doesn't make slavery OK, it just means that whites don't owe blacks anything, and it means that blacks really have no justification for hating whites because of slavery.
No, you don't get it. The pilgrimage from Mali to Mecca under the reign of Mansa Musa wound up fianancing the Renaissance. Think about how that would've changed history.
Although, this brings up an interesting side point. You know what happened to the kingdom of Mali? Well, after Mansa Musa made his wealth (and kingdom) known, Mali began appearing on maps in the Middle East and Europe. By the 16th Century, Mali was known as Songhai, a kingdom that was ultimately destroyed when the more modern Moroccan army invaded.
Point is, your example of a wealthy African kingdom - which I grant you, certainly existed - was wiped out by fighting with other African nations, and the trade routes that had brought the region prosperity were wiped out as well. You can't really blame Europeans for that one

I AM saying that if colonialism hadn't occurred, or had taken on a different method not involving mass enslavement as historically happened:
1) Africa WOULD be in better shape than it is today.
2) There would not be mass resentment toward whites by blacks in America, for one there wouldn't be as many, and two they wouldn't be descendants of slaves, Jim Crow, and current 2nd class citizens.
1) Africa WOULD be in better shape than it is today.
2) There would not be mass resentment toward whites by blacks in America, for one there wouldn't be as many, and two they wouldn't be descendants of slaves, Jim Crow, and current 2nd class citizens.
That doesn't make slavery OK, it just means that whites don't owe blacks anything, and it means that blacks really have no justification for hating whites because of slavery.
Comment