Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do I join a political party in Canada?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For who exactly did he write the paper? There's probably a reason it didn't appear in a science mag.
    In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Oncle Boris
      For who exactly did he write the paper? There's probably a reason it didn't appear in a science mag.
      It's appeared in many science journals...

      He doesn't just write papers under commission from a journal or something. He writes them to get his ideas in the open.

      It also was printed in The World of Mathematics, not just Mind.
      "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
      Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Asher

        You would be less useless if you understood perhaps the most relevant mind of the last century. He's revolutionized the world, and you don't know much about him? Agathon, dear, being the 1 millionth person to analyze Plato in depth isn't very helpful. If you're going to be a philosopher, study modern things and progress from there.
        Yeaaaaah, why are we bothering to offer 'introduction to machine language' courses? Those people would be better revolutionizing the world, every 2 months!
        In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Asher

          It's appeared in many science journals...
          If it was only retaken by the philosophy journal, then it doesn't demonstrate anything about Turing's interest.

          If it was first published in it, though, the issue is settled.
          In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Oncle Boris
            If it was only retaken by the philosophy journal, then it doesn't demonstrate anything about Turing's interest.

            If it was first published in it, though, the issue is settled.
            What kind of logic is that? ...

            That paper was not his first published on mechanized intelligence.

            Proposed Electronic Calculator was published in '46.
            The Automatic Computing Engine in '47.
            Intelligent Machinery in '48.

            Computing Machinery and Intelligence was published in '50, in "Mind", because Turing wanted a wider audience than his previous works. He would be preaching to the choir if he simply kept adding new journals to the regular math journals.

            So he chose Mind, for a wider audience. Something which molly's article says quite literally.
            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

            Comment


            • BTW, Computing Machinery and Intelligence is available online here: http://www.abelard.org/turpap/turpap.htm
              "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
              Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Asher

                What kind of logic is that? ...

                So he chose Mind, for a wider audience. Something which molly's article says quite literally.

                Better than yours- he published a paper in a journal of philosophy because he mistook it for Popular Mechanics, or Sheepfarmers' Monthly, hmm?


                Yes, for an audience familiar with philosophical concepts such as what constitutes consciousness, how may consciousness be differentiated between machines and humans if it exists in both, and so on he publishes in a journal where such familiar ideas are debated.

                If you imagine that consciousness is not a proper subject for philosophical debate, or has not been, then you are demonstrating an obtuseness which will not be penetrated by even small words spoken slowly or spelt out in big letters. Try Rene Descartes, for instance- cogito, ergo sum.

                Did Turing ever say anything about his feet?

                Shall we then assume he had no interest in wearing footwear?

                He does not have to say explicitly:

                'I am interested in philosophy'

                to be interested in many different aspects of logic, reason, thought, morality, all of which can usefully covered by the umbrella term philosophy.

                That is, philosophy which is the pursuit of wisdom, or of the knowledge of things and their causes (natural, moral, et cetera), the study of ultimate realities and general principles, well I could go on, but try to pretend that Turing wasn't interested in any of those things when he was talking with Wittgenstein or trying to define consciousness.
                Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Tingkai
                  The Conservative support will drop after Stronach gets "elected".
                  Yes, because all the moderates will be frightened back to the Liberals by the selection of a moderate leader.
                  Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Agathon
                    You're forgetting that Wittgenstein started out as an engineer and became interested in philosophy because he wondered about the foundations of mathematics.
                    No wonder his philosophy rots.

                    Actually, I am only familar with his religious philosophy, and that part certainly smells. It's particularly ironic that he understand something about maths.
                    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Urban Ranger


                      No wonder his philosophy rots.

                      Actually, I am only familar with his religious philosophy, and that part certainly smells. It's particularly ironic that he understand something about maths.
                      What religious philosophy?
                      Only feebs vote.

                      Comment


                      • Too late to join the Conservatives to vote in the leadership race. Cut off was last week.

                        The way they have decided to conduct the voting - having each riding in Canada worth 100 points for a total of 30800 points, would make your vote in Calgary absolutely useless. Most Calgary riding associations have between 1000 - 3000 members, the vast majority of which are Harper supporters.

                        If Gay rights, or any other human rights issues are a make or break issue join the NDP.

                        I'm in Calgary for 6 more weeks - Buy me a beer and I'll sign you up !!
                        There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Asher

                          A true scientist can ignore a philosopher, because all of those exist without a pesky beret following you around with "what ifs" and "whys" when there is work to be done.
                          Isn't the work of a true scientist to ask things like "what if" and "why"? Isn't that like the whole point of being a scientist, questioning the way things are and reasoning out answers based on the evidence found?
                          Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
                          -Richard Dawkins

                          Comment


                          • Shh, Starchild. He's a computer "scientist".
                            urgh.NSFW

                            Comment


                            • I thought the rule was not to ask 'why', but instead to ask 'how'. Why isn't very productive outside of Theology. Or something like that.

                              Originally posted by Uncle Sparky
                              Too late to join the Conservatives to vote in the leadership race. Cut off was last week.

                              The way they have decided to conduct the voting - having each riding in Canada worth 100 points for a total of 30800 points, would make your vote in Calgary absolutely useless. Most Calgary riding associations have between 1000 - 3000 members, the vast majority of which are Harper supporters.

                              If Gay rights, or any other human rights issues are a make or break issue join the NDP.

                              I'm in Calgary for 6 more weeks - Buy me a beer and I'll sign you up !!
                              There's no way in Hades that the Conservatives would have agreed to merge if it were done any other way. The point is to rebuild the party in the ROC and have something capable of forming a government, not to have yet another party dominated by Westerners with zero chance of success East of Thunder Bay.

                              I'm sure the ND are disappointed that the Tories didn't commit electoral suicide and held out for that point.
                              (\__/)
                              (='.'=)
                              (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                              Comment


                              • Yes, because all the moderates will be frightened back to the Liberals by the selection of a moderate leader.
                                Why would they vote for a Conservative party that is Liberal-lite?

                                I can vote for the Liberals if that is what I want.
                                Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                                "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                                2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X