My favorite was always Pslams 137:9
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.
So the male babies that were killed weren't blameless? How?? And what a wonderful example of mercy mass rape is
Since when is the mass slaughter of infants not murder?
That's what happened to me. After reading all the god-ordered cruelty in the OT for the first time (it always got skipped over in Church) I just couldn't take any of the rest of it as seriously as before and it wasn't long before the whole thing fell apart in my eyes.
How so? As a literary character he's not a terribly nice guy and because so many people take him seriously which character is important.
So the Holocaust wasn't genocide???
How so? All you've got are the Gospels.
Well you can't take the OT accounts at face value, a lot of it is just empty bragging. It grossly exaggerates the rapidity and the thoroughness of the conquest by the Israelites. It probably wasn't anything exceptional and at the time there wasn't any major difference between Judaism and other Hebrew religions (probably wasn't even monotheistic, just monolaitric).
You should keep in mind that Satan is different in Islamic than in Christian tradition. There his only real sin is refusing to bow to anyone but God, not direct rebellion against God. In many ways, America does match up pretty well to the Satan of Islamic tradition.
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.
Rather than desiring the complete destruction of the Midianites, God spares the blameless from his wrath, not only preserving them, but drawing them into his fold, into the nation of Israel.

Do not murder is different from do not kill.
That's the whole point, Ben. Once you start looking at the Bible with a little bit of skepticism, analyzing it as you would any other book, the whole damn thing falls apart.
Otherwise, it is pointless to condemn a non-existent God for genocide
Genocide seeks the complete destruction of a peoples.
Given the facts, the events surrounding the resurrection, the situation, all corroborated by independent sources, and eyewitness testimony, the resurrection is the most reasonable explanation for these events.
While every other people committed mass slaughter while invading, it was not oftend they so completely destroyed other peoples as did the Hebrews described in the Old Testament.
I haven't heard anything from Al Qaeda other than the fact that they consider the US to be the great Satan.
Comment