Well, I guess I should be happy because other then the odd IED the Insurgents seem to have stopped targeting Coalition Military Forces at least for now. The down side is they are now concentrating on softer targets like Iraqi Civilians who work with the Coalition. Yesterday morning a bus full of civilians who work at the Iraqi Media Network radio station in Bahquba (the same place my friend's Humvee got IEDed) got ambushed and of the 14 people on the bus four were killed and eight wounded. A SUV with two men in it stopped in front of the bus at a choke point along the road and then fired a RPG followed by small arms fire from an AK-47 and an SSK machinegun.
I've met everyone who works at the radio station on the three times I've been there and one of out detachments (12 people) are based out of the radio compound. Naturally, everyone is taking the death of their co-workers hard and most of the civilians are refusing to go back to work until so sort of escorts can be arranged. I don't know how they can be guarded 24/7. The attack happened 3 km away from the station and from what I understand it was a grizzly scene with blood every where and the wild dogs trying to drink the pooled blood off of the ground.
Tomorrow I'm going on a convoy to Baghdad and then on to the radio station in Bahquba so we can drop of supplies and see if we can help in any way. I'm not sure if there is anything we can really do but we will see.
Another disturbing thing is that with in five minutes of the attack camera men from Al Jazeera TV where one the scene. They got there before the Iraqi police even knew what had happened and there is zero chance the Arab news network could have been listening in on encryted US military radio traffic. Since Bahquba is so far off of the beaten track it makes me wonder if Al Jazeera reporters knew in advance the attack on civilians was going to take place. I've also seen past reports of Al Jazeera posting news about terror attack in Iraq BEFORE the attacks even happen. Donald Rumsfield has repeatedly accused Al Jazeera of knowing about terror attacks in advance but failing to inform police in order to protect civilians.
It's one thing to go after armed military men but it is inexcusable to know about plans to murder civilians yet to do nothing about it.
I've met everyone who works at the radio station on the three times I've been there and one of out detachments (12 people) are based out of the radio compound. Naturally, everyone is taking the death of their co-workers hard and most of the civilians are refusing to go back to work until so sort of escorts can be arranged. I don't know how they can be guarded 24/7. The attack happened 3 km away from the station and from what I understand it was a grizzly scene with blood every where and the wild dogs trying to drink the pooled blood off of the ground.
Tomorrow I'm going on a convoy to Baghdad and then on to the radio station in Bahquba so we can drop of supplies and see if we can help in any way. I'm not sure if there is anything we can really do but we will see.
Another disturbing thing is that with in five minutes of the attack camera men from Al Jazeera TV where one the scene. They got there before the Iraqi police even knew what had happened and there is zero chance the Arab news network could have been listening in on encryted US military radio traffic. Since Bahquba is so far off of the beaten track it makes me wonder if Al Jazeera reporters knew in advance the attack on civilians was going to take place. I've also seen past reports of Al Jazeera posting news about terror attack in Iraq BEFORE the attacks even happen. Donald Rumsfield has repeatedly accused Al Jazeera of knowing about terror attacks in advance but failing to inform police in order to protect civilians.
It's one thing to go after armed military men but it is inexcusable to know about plans to murder civilians yet to do nothing about it.
Comment