so we can kick more azz
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What do you think is the baddest ass piece of military hardware?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Nope, it's something new for Russian military.Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
Something new for US military? Saw a story somewhere... Can't recall the name, though.
Comment
-
In accordance with newest statistic data in 2003, in Russian Federation lived 147 millions.Originally posted by Joseph
Now Serb is not going to like this but it would not be stalemate, I assured you.
Russia, 134 million pop. 50% or so are woman. 62 million men left. How many under 50 years of age?
Let's say 50%. 31 million to fight.
US, 280 million pop. 51% are woman. 135 million men.
I think it up to 54% are under 50. About 66 to 68 million are able to fight. That is about 2 to 1 for the USA.
In 1991, in Soviet Union lived 291 millions.
The best equipment is still the F-14, 15, 16, and 18. They have never lost a air to air battle while being flown by US pilot. The best Tank is the M1A2. They have never lost a battle with an another tank.
They never fought versus their Russian counterparts (Su-27, Su-30, T-80U, T90) piloted by Russians.
Had Iraqis American equipment of 80's, the result would be the same.Remember the first Gulf War, and you saw the picture of the highway with all of the bomb out vehicle, well there is this guy who was there, now working with me, and he told me, that picture was only part of it. He said it was far worse than they were allow to show.
I just curious, where did you get those details?Serb the F-117 that was shot down because the people on the ground saw the plane. Maybe it was not dark enough or the plane was to low or what ever, but they saw it with their eyes and fired the missile and shot it down. If you can see it, you can shoot at it. If you cannot see it, it petty hard to shoot at.
In this case F-15 is just an update of the F-4.Also the SU-30 is just an update of the SU-27.
Comment
-
I know the difference, but I guess I've made a mistake. You said - "Our (USA) track record is still better in that regard" and I thought you're saying that Russia brake/withdraw from treaties more often than USA. That's why I asked you to bring an example when we broke a treaty last time.Originally posted by Vince278
Breaking a treaty - One party to the treaty unilaterally refusing to fulfill a treaty obligation without cause or never intending to fulfill them in the first place. (example: German violation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 1939 to attack the Soviet Union)
Withdrawing from a treaty - Giving notice, within the provisions of the treaty, that you no longer wish to be bound by the terms of the treaty after a specified time. (example: DeGaulle taking France out of NATO)
The difference, you see, is that breaking a treaty is generally considered illegal and dishonorable. Withdrawing from a treaty, however, is entirely legal when allowed by that treaty, another treaty, or by consent of the parties to the treaty.
So, to bring it all together, President Bush withdrawing the US from the ABM Treaty is entirely legal because the provisions of the treaty allow it as long as formal notice was given.
Hope that helps.
Comment
-
Russian MLRS Smerch (Tornado), fire 12 guided missiles under 38 seconds to a distance of 70 km, covering an area of 672 000 square meters.Originally posted by Verto
It appears to be from the MLRS Rocket Artillery System, which can, if I remember correctly, fire 12 missiles under 60 seconds, to a distance of 30 kilometers.
BOOM!!!.
Comment
-
-
He killed brits and yanks, Strachwitz mainly rooskies.Originally posted by Ecthelion
Were did Wittmann fight? did he kill rooskies or yanks?Originally posted by Serb:Please, remind me, how exactly and when exactly, Russia bullied its neighbors?
Originally posted by Ted Striker:Go Serb !
Originally posted by Pekka:If it was possible to capture the essentials of Sepultura in a dildo, I'd attach it to a bicycle and ride it up your azzes.
Comment
-
Yeah, after the defence cuts, we only have some of these and some subs. Quality instead of quantity.Originally posted by Lonestar
You really love that ship, don't you?So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Serb
In this case F-15 is just an update of the F-4.
Except, you know, the different airframes. whereas the Sukhois in question share the same airframes.
Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.
Comment
Comment