I think one of the reasons for the dual cities (besides incomplete historical research) is if you are only playing with one of the civs. Say you play with Romans, not England. Romans have Londinium. Vice versa, English get London. If both are used, then it seems that Civ isn't an historical recreation of history (which it isn't). Civ was meant to make your own history, so.....let there be one city of two names.
I'm surpirsed your not complaining about something less trivial, such as the fact that Greece is led by a *gasp* Macedonian .
I'm surpirsed your not complaining about something less trivial, such as the fact that Greece is led by a *gasp* Macedonian .
Comment