New pictures at Gamespot & all civs listed

[stankarp]

But that is not the same as stack combat. I cant see how individual unit attacks all the time is going to work in MP. When I played CTP2 MP, the Yanks got the ****s if you took 2 minutes for a move.

[alva]

Originally posted by Flinx


All I've been thinking since I saw those dinosaur pics has been Dinosaur Barbarians

You might like this thread

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=56905&perpage=25&pagenumber=1

[Gangerolf]

Originally posted by statusperfect
BTW... Has noone noticed the new unit in the lower left of screen 23...? and DON'T YOU DARE to say it's a medieval infantry, when you take a closer look it's not. Maybe Carthage?

it could be an improved spearman or pikeman... i hope carthage has some sort of elephant unit though

[Proserpine]

Originally posted by Darkworld Ark


A little overpowering for a upgrade of the Swordsman, since it adds 1 to both attack & movement, making it an ancient Knight that you can get two advances after you begin the game.

Did anybody else see that we now have 3 militaristic & religious civs?

A slightly less powerful samurai (4.4.2 IIRC)? Fopr those who care about such things, as I recall the Celts were pretty feared in attack but not so hot on defence, so 4.2.1 sounds about right to me. I'll take 'em!

[Proserpine]

Originally posted by statusperfect
BTW... Has noone noticed the new unit in the lower left of screen 23...? and DON'T YOU DARE to say it's a medieval infantry, when you take a closer look it's not. Maybe Carthage?

Looks sorta medieval-ish to me . . . I'd say the Ottomans, if the historicity is in keeping with RL.

[Stuie]

Originally posted by player1
Is that only me, or there is an different tile-set in those screenshots?

Ocean water is more blue (same for rivers).
Resources and mines look a little bit bright.
And several other things.

They should contact sn00py and get some decent graphics in the game. I couldn't believe what a step backward the tiles in the screenshot were, and then I remembered I was using sn00py's trees and oceans and mountains.

[Jon Shafer]

Didn't I say that the Koreans would be in and the Incas wouldn't?

[ixnay]

If I remember hearing him right, some of Sn00py's graphics will be included in the game.

[Jon Shafer]

That's right. He hasn't told us what all they're going to include though.

[player1]

Originally posted by Stuie
They should contact sn00py and get some decent graphics in the game. I couldn't believe what a step backward the tiles in the screenshot were, and then I remembered I was using sn00py's trees and oceans and mountains.

Strange.
My oppinion is just the opposite.

(maybe that's because I never like cartoonish looking of sn00py's graphic, especialy the trees)

[Lawrence of Arabia]

I'll bet that the Bezerker is also an upgraded medieval infantry. They'll be either 5/2/1 or 4/3/1.

[Gangerolf]

No Incas

One reason for not including the Incas could be that they would be the only South American civ. On a world map they would have the entire continent to themselves.

[sabrewolf]

Re: No Incas

Originally posted by Gangerolf
One reason for not including the Incas could be that they would be the only South American civ. On a world map they would have the entire continent to themselves.

yeah... but now the aztecs can expand down south and have middle AND south america

[Gangerolf]

true.
What they could do is add 2 or 3 South American civs, Incas, Brazilians and ehmm Colombians. problem solved

[Darkworld Ark]

Re: No Incas

Originally posted by Gangerolf
One reason for not including the Incas could be that they would be the only South American civ. On a world map they would have the entire continent to themselves.

That, & their starting location would suck on real maps, since S. America is mostly mountains & jungles.