Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I can't believe this..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Trip


    Like I said earlier, maybe we should start up a list of people who we know to be 'real' civ players, and not just rush-players. We could put it in a thread and sticky it in the Civ 3 MP forum, and keep a tally of the number of complaints for each person on the list. With, say, 3 complaints of 'devious tactics' (), then they get blacklisted and can go play the AI for a while.

    Whaddya guys think?
    If the rush is as rampant as we fear it will be, certainly something like that will be necassary to keep the integrity of the game?
    I'll second that

    I guess we'll see if the mods have considered this idea when the time comes. Learn from Locutus from the CtP forums and his MP signup Topped threads
    signature not visible until patch comes out.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Trip


      Like I said earlier, maybe we should start up a list of people who we know to be 'real' civ players, and not just rush-players. We could put it in a thread and sticky it in the Civ 3 MP forum, and keep a tally of the number of complaints for each person on the list. With, say, 3 complaints of 'devious tactics' (), then they get blacklisted and can go play the AI for a while.

      Whaddya guys think?
      If the rush is as rampant as we fear it will be, certainly something like that will be necassary to keep the integrity of the game?
      i'd join in here too...

      but what do you define as rushing? just warrors? or chariot/horsemen too? what should players of civs like aztecs, zulu or iroquois do? they want to trigger GA but if rushing isn't allowed?

      don't get me wrong: i sucked in AoE2 MP because my first barrack was built when the enemy stormed my village with 20+ soldiers... that's why i hate rushing
      - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
      - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

      Comment


      • ming: i'd love to see a free choice of traits and maybe even UUs!

        but noone would choose scientific, commercial and expansionist... even less than in SP...
        - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
        - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

        Comment


        • You wouldn't chose expansionist? Never say never.
          (\__/)
          (='.'=)
          (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

          Comment


          • I choose them all in SP because I decide which nation I want to play, not which traits. Commercial certainly used to be one of my favourites before patches and tweaks to the optimum city numbers made corruption less crippling. I won't be playing MP for the sorts of reasons Vel highlights. If you need to employ trick tactics to circumvent the games' intended rules to keep your head above water then I don't want to play.
            To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
            H.Poincaré

            Comment


            • Originally posted by notyoueither
              You wouldn't chose expansionist? Never say never.
              not in MP.
              MP-games should go reasonably fast --> smaller world sizes --> expansionist trait far weaker than on huge maps.

              commercial is disadvantageous for the same reason... because it won't be endless building, corruption shouldn't be that big issue as in SP.
              - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
              - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

              Comment


              • How does religious or scientific help you when you get rushed by the exp-mil civ on a small map?
                (\__/)
                (='.'=)
                (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by notyoueither
                  How does religious or scientific help you when you get rushed by the exp-mil civ on a small map?
                  in my earlier post i also said, scientific won't be chosen.

                  religious: cheap temples...
                  not good against warrior rush, but it does help to have bigger cities and so usually better production. q.e.d
                  - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
                  - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

                  Comment


                  • Which would you chose?
                    (\__/)
                    (='.'=)
                    (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                    Comment


                    • The bigger culture border from temples might give you that extra turn or two to prepare defences and rush a few more troops....
                      To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                      H.Poincaré

                      Comment


                      • Not really. Think about it.
                        (\__/)
                        (='.'=)
                        (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                        Comment


                        • Think about what? Are you presupposing a rush so early that there are no roads yet?
                          To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                          H.Poincaré

                          Comment


                          • You don't get road bonus in territory you do not have ROP with. There are no roads were the warriors or horsemen approach from. What difference does it make?
                            (\__/)
                            (='.'=)
                            (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by notyoueither
                              You don't get road bonus in territory you do not have ROP with. There are no roads were the warriors or horsemen approach from. What difference does it make?
                              nye, I think Grumbold referred to the fact that you can "see" a larger territory, so you are warned a bit earlier there is an invasion force coming.

                              Comment


                              • That is true. 1 extra turn, maybe 2.

                                I hope it's worth it.
                                (\__/)
                                (='.'=)
                                (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X