A new way to determine a Winner

[War4ever]

yeah pop scoring is a pain for short games, its certainly does not indicate the winner, just who is leading...

especially if some people dont' WTLCD in the first session or dont' pick up pyramids...

pg wins are lame, we all get them, and like rah said, many times i am smaller than him in pop but i have a lethal army and i just take cities...

and of course, he has been known to do the same thing

[rah]

Well, that's the difference, I try not to claim PG cheap wins anymore, I look at the positions to judge how I did. Which makes me think we don't really need a new scoring system, even though some goal oriented games could be interesting.

[War4ever]

Yeah i agree...i just want more out of my 4-6 hour games....it feels empty after awhile...god where have i heard that expression before

its rare to find it balanced after one session unless the land dictates the same sh!t to every one...

[DrSpike]

Hehe War wants commitment, but all Rah can offer is one night stands.

[Ben Kenobi]

Ming:

You can rotate the Barb wonder cities.

That's one way to improve playability for one particular map.

[Hydey]

Why do we need to determine a winner?

Shyte I am happy to have time to play a game , don't care if I win or lose.

[Alexander's Horse]

I'd be happy just to see Hydey play a game.

He doesn't care who wins or loses because the games he's in NEVER GET FINISHED.