History PBEM

[Jacobite1688]

I, too, put in my candidacy for SG but also I am pleased that ANZAC is my opponent. I feel the League will prosper under either of us.

[Cyrion]

Vittorio Emmanuele is thinking hard about whom deserves his vote the most...

My private swiss bank account number will follow by PM...

[sas]

.

[sas]

A question to Scott:

In the time we have played you have had 37-39 cities, and this is the increase in the number of units you have. From 1904-1905 your number increased with 59 units. Please explain how you did this. Feel free to check on the saves people. Considering the cost to buy a complete new unit in this scenario, the maths doesnt make sense.


1904: 127 Units
1905: 186 Units
1906: 221 Units
1907: 254 Units

[Jacobite1688]

This appears to be a matter of great seriousness!

I demand Germany explain this immediately!

[Soundwave]

I demand Germany explain this immediately! ! !

No-one should cheat it ruins the game, also if i am wrong in saying you do, then i'm terribly sorry i know if feels to be fausely accused.

please explain:

[sas]

The reason i discovered this is because i play the same game in Civfanatics, and the number of German units where allmost twice the sice of my army in this game. This made no sense at all compared to the other game, so i decided to check his progress for each round.

[Soundwave]

hmmmmmmmmmmm

[sas]

I really hate it when some asshol* ruins the game. Considering how many hours of gameplay is put into a good PBEM game by so many players.

I hope Scott have some miracle explenation, but i dont see how he could do this unless someone gifted him a hell of alot of units.

[Soundwave]

LOL... sorry wrong time, but worth it

(brb for my vote for sg, i want money!)

[Jacobite1688]

Okay, I guess I can just post this publicly:

If the German player has, infact, been cheating (via hex editing the save or whatever - and I hope he has not - I trust he will explain this and the game will continue) then we have a problem. If no satisfactory explanation is given, the game in not over, we just have no choice but to fairly partision Germany through the League of Nations and execute a plan to remove the Germans from the game. Perhaps the CivCity utillity could be use on the save to redistribute German cities? This would prevent us from even needing to fight it out.

[The ANZAC]

This really is strange Let Scott get back to us and then we'll see what we have to do.

I don't think we need to partition Germany, just get a new player if this is true. Also if we did, it would be easy enough through playing Mulitplayer at the same time as the German player ie Germany and France online trade cities.

I hope it isn't needed...

[The ANZAC]

So far in the elections for Secretary-General of the League of Nations:

The ANZAC: 1 vote
Jacobite1688: 1 vote

UK: The ANZAC
Russia: Jacobite1688
France: na
Italy: na
Austria-Hungary: na
Germany: na
Ottoman Empire: na

[Soundwave]

Hmmm....

BTW no conficence vote hasn't been given yet, so hold your horse's anzac... please

[Darius871]

According to ANZAC all a new election takes is a proposal and a confirmation. He proposed, and I confirmed, so I thought that a new election would come now, not a vote on whether we will elect.