How about this PM to Archaic? It contains rather much information, so if you want to leave things out, please suggest changes to the PM draft. I do think though giving this information is needed if we want to pact with the Hive and at the same time still convince Archaic of our friendly intentions, and prove that we can be a good ally against his enemies the Hive and Drones.
So what's your opinion what we're willing to pay for PUT technology? EcoEng and EnvEcon is of course always great. But if we're going for the PEG, even SotHB might be valuable, as with the trance ability we can upgrade our simple 0-1-1 crawlers instead of 0-3-1 to 0-3t-1, which IIRC gives much more minerals for the upgrade cost you have to pay. Preferable would be only to get a trance scout though, and not the tech itself. But probably Archaic won't have the naval capacity to ship such a trance scout to us.
Hi Dean Archaic,
From the reactions from cyborgs up until now it seems everyone is in favour of signing a pact with you. Such a pact will be needed if we both still want to have a chance at winning the game, because we have recently learned that the Hive intends to aim for a 2-way cooperative victory with the Drones.
Would you mind though if we waited a few years with signing the pact in-game? There are two main reasons for that.
The first is that this year we signed a pact with the Hive. They had promised us a pact and even a co-operative victory a long time ago, but we waited for the start of the PEACE war to sign it as we didn't want PEACE to indirectly gain infiltrator info on us via their ally the Hive. However just this year we learned that the Hive will try to co-op with the Drones, and intends to break their pact with us some time in the future. We decided to sign the pact with the Hive anyway, as they or their pact mate the Drone will become planetary governor, gaining infiltrator information on us. Thus we lose nothing by a pact, but still gain infiltrator info on the Hive. The Hive doesn't know though we know they aren't serious about the Hive-CyCon pact. Therefore if we would now directly sign a pact with you, in the Hive's eyes their archenemy, it would be very considered very odd by them, they would become suspicious, and would (rightly so) think we aren't serious anymore about the Hive-CyCon pact.
The second reason is related to PEACE. We don't want them to realize too soon they stand no chance against us. If they do, who knows they might obliterate all their bases just to annoy us , or seek help with our rivals the Hive or Drones. That would work in both our disadvantage. So it would be best that we don't sign pacts with both PEACE's allies right after starting the war as they'll feel completely isolated. Perhaps you could even give them some vague signs that you're on their side.
We could then pact after we have captured PEACE's most important bases. We of the Consciousness could also make some public announcement that we're willing to pact with everyone that's interested. That would make it less weird for the Hive when we then ally with you some time later.
To answer your other questions, we don't mind - would even encourage it - if you keep your pact with PEACE until they are fully assimilated, as you'll then gain extra trade, and PEACE won't be too discouraged too fast.
Regarding maps, we have indirectly deduced the exact locations of all factions, but we haven't actually mapped them in-game. This will probably change though after we assimilate PEACE map data. If you want to exchange maps, I'd suggest we do it by exchanging screenshots instead of an in-game world map trade. That way if the map of one of us is stolen by probes, the other's map isn't stolen as well.
Talking about probes, the Hive has told us a while back that they intend to probe rape you after gaining planetary governor infiltration on you. Do you have a sufficient fleet and probe defences to withstand them? If not, we would suggest you start building them up. Later we could send some of our cruisers to help you defend, but at the moment they have other business as you probably know.
I'll probably contact you later to see if technology trading is possible right now. You indicated in your previous PM that you considered Doc:Ini and AppPhys paltry in exchange for EcoEng, while the time that GT offered this exact deal to us, - though we are certainly willing to accept non-proliferation - we found two technologies in exchange for one too high. Therefore we'll probably need some internal discussions to see what we're willing to offer for technologies such as EcoEng, EnvEcon and SotHB.
Friendly greetings,
Maniac
From the reactions from cyborgs up until now it seems everyone is in favour of signing a pact with you. Such a pact will be needed if we both still want to have a chance at winning the game, because we have recently learned that the Hive intends to aim for a 2-way cooperative victory with the Drones.
Would you mind though if we waited a few years with signing the pact in-game? There are two main reasons for that.
The first is that this year we signed a pact with the Hive. They had promised us a pact and even a co-operative victory a long time ago, but we waited for the start of the PEACE war to sign it as we didn't want PEACE to indirectly gain infiltrator info on us via their ally the Hive. However just this year we learned that the Hive will try to co-op with the Drones, and intends to break their pact with us some time in the future. We decided to sign the pact with the Hive anyway, as they or their pact mate the Drone will become planetary governor, gaining infiltrator information on us. Thus we lose nothing by a pact, but still gain infiltrator info on the Hive. The Hive doesn't know though we know they aren't serious about the Hive-CyCon pact. Therefore if we would now directly sign a pact with you, in the Hive's eyes their archenemy, it would be very considered very odd by them, they would become suspicious, and would (rightly so) think we aren't serious anymore about the Hive-CyCon pact.
The second reason is related to PEACE. We don't want them to realize too soon they stand no chance against us. If they do, who knows they might obliterate all their bases just to annoy us , or seek help with our rivals the Hive or Drones. That would work in both our disadvantage. So it would be best that we don't sign pacts with both PEACE's allies right after starting the war as they'll feel completely isolated. Perhaps you could even give them some vague signs that you're on their side.
We could then pact after we have captured PEACE's most important bases. We of the Consciousness could also make some public announcement that we're willing to pact with everyone that's interested. That would make it less weird for the Hive when we then ally with you some time later.
To answer your other questions, we don't mind - would even encourage it - if you keep your pact with PEACE until they are fully assimilated, as you'll then gain extra trade, and PEACE won't be too discouraged too fast.
Regarding maps, we have indirectly deduced the exact locations of all factions, but we haven't actually mapped them in-game. This will probably change though after we assimilate PEACE map data. If you want to exchange maps, I'd suggest we do it by exchanging screenshots instead of an in-game world map trade. That way if the map of one of us is stolen by probes, the other's map isn't stolen as well.
Talking about probes, the Hive has told us a while back that they intend to probe rape you after gaining planetary governor infiltration on you. Do you have a sufficient fleet and probe defences to withstand them? If not, we would suggest you start building them up. Later we could send some of our cruisers to help you defend, but at the moment they have other business as you probably know.
I'll probably contact you later to see if technology trading is possible right now. You indicated in your previous PM that you considered Doc:Ini and AppPhys paltry in exchange for EcoEng, while the time that GT offered this exact deal to us, - though we are certainly willing to accept non-proliferation - we found two technologies in exchange for one too high. Therefore we'll probably need some internal discussions to see what we're willing to offer for technologies such as EcoEng, EnvEcon and SotHB.
Friendly greetings,
Maniac
So what's your opinion what we're willing to pay for PUT technology? EcoEng and EnvEcon is of course always great. But if we're going for the PEG, even SotHB might be valuable, as with the trance ability we can upgrade our simple 0-1-1 crawlers instead of 0-3-1 to 0-3t-1, which IIRC gives much more minerals for the upgrade cost you have to pay. Preferable would be only to get a trance scout though, and not the tech itself. But probably Archaic won't have the naval capacity to ship such a trance scout to us.
Comment