Lizzy's rise to greatness

[Dinner]

If we start writing next turn then how long will it be before bronze working is finished?

[Ben Kenobi]

It's like Dinner has a single track mind.

"We need more soldiers, general, any half baked revolutionary could whip our army as it stands!"

[Dinner]

Ben, don't you have to go play in traffic or something?

Anyway, it was a simple question. Next turn we start on writing and once that is finished we will start on bronzeworking so I was wondering what the estimate was for when bronze working was done. I wanted to see how many turns the Inca theoretically could have to build up axemen to attack us; I don't believe they will but I wanted to look at if such an attack was even feasible or not.

[Ben Kenobi]

I'm just saying, when I can predict what you'll post before you'll post it's getting old.

We'll have Bronze Working soon enough - what's more concerning is that we're falling behind in GDP.

[Calanthian]

* Mz, I logged in and only moved Bellerophon, as that was agreed upon. The other moves are yours to make.

* Writing will be finished in 6, max 7 turns.

[Calanthian]

In our third city, which still has to be named (something with a "B" ?), we should build a workboat fast, and send it to the Inca's to get our trade network hooked up..





Furthermore I would like to propose a border to them:
"the lands beyond the desert near Mount Gondar"
and if they make a counterproposal with the river as border, then it is also fine..

[Dinner]

If they go for it great. I wouldn't though if I were them. I'd just keep pushing it closer and closer if I were them.

[mzprox]

Screen from current turn and proposed moves for the warriors:

[mzprox]

I don't think it's a good idea too make such a border proposal. even if they agree on it they will be angry later that we deceived them. First we should only say that we want a fair border agreement, and the border would be at about the same distance from our capitals.

Btw Inca has used slavery this turn, probably finished a settlers unit.

[DNK]

I've discussed this in the diplo thread. We should just make a 50T agreement to not expand aggressively towards each other, meaning to not found cities more than X tiles away from our capitals (I threw out 12 tiles, 1.4x for diagonals, but whatever works).

[Dinner]

A civ using slavery can really pump out a lot of units fast.

[DNK]

Yeah, and we have plenty of time to respond if they are. Any serious increase in military is going to show up soon enough in the demographics screen since no one has any army right now (1-2 units more than us at most, though most of the difference is probably accounted for by someone having BW). We'll have demographics on Inca soon enough as well.

[mzprox]

Screens from current turn:

I moved Belle close to the Inca to get more view of their land, I hope they won't take it as an aggressive move.
Named third city port Apolytan, we can change it when we find the final name.

[Dinner]

The warrior on the hill isn't doing anything any more since there is no more fog to bust. Time to move him some where else.

[Hercules]

I moved Belle close to the Inca to get more view of their land, I hope they won't take it as an aggressive move.
Named third city port Apolytan, we can change it when we find the final name.

Re: Belle I don't think you indicated that in your proposed warrior moves. If we have got our diplo response to them in time it should be ok. But?

Re city name here our some B names

Boreas
Bacchus
Botrys
Bolina