Open letter to the Indian Administration and the Spanish Administration
I want to put an end on all speculation concerning the re-capturing of Boston by the Americans recently.
1. America has bought several troops from Germany. These troops were bought. These troops have never returned to Germany and are still under the American flag. America has payed much money for these troops.
2. America has lend a few troops from Germany as well. These troops have been used to defend the American cities in case of a huge war would follow and the American cities would be unprotected because it's soldiers were besieging Boston. America has paid much money for lending these troops.
3. America has bought several units from the French as well, again in exchange for money.
4. America has planned the besieging of Boston all by itself. It didn't want to have an open world war break out again. All allies have been informed shortly in advance (on which the German and the French insisted that their units should not be used for offensive purposes, which was no problem since America had more use for city defense)
The allies were asked to not intervene in the war and stay neutral, once again: to prevent an open world war to break out again.
5. America had not the intention to start an open war with India. Robert wanted to scare the Indians and push them into giving Boston back.
Robert made two mistakes. Firstly: he kept the greater part of the army beyond the sight of the Indians, for strategical purposes, which didn't match with his main goal, to frighten India. Therefor India was not frightened enough to give up Boston immediately.
Then, when India didn't gave in immediately, Robert made the mistake to start a small scale attack on Boston. He did this, once again, to show the Indian that it was serious business.
Strategically this worked perfectly. The Indian catapults inside Boston attacked the small part of the American army, only damaging a few units. The American catapults were used to clear the cultural defense of the city, and then the greater part of the army marched over the american ways to Boston (remember that Boston was still in American teritory, culturally. To attack the city, the american armies didn't need to march through Indian territory!)
When the Indians saw the huge army that Robert kept out of sight, they gave in, seeing that this army was huge enough to not only take Boston, but to march to Madras and perhaps even Delhi, and take it.
All nations should know that the army consisted of over 12 catapults, 15 macemen, 5 longbowmen, 8 crossbowmen and 4 spearmen.
The sole purpose of this army was to re-take Boston.
Boston is an American city which was token by force by the Indian. If the Indians are allowed to take Boston by force, then so is America allowed to take it back by force. The nations of Terra should, no matter were their loyalty lies, agree with this. If they do not, there's no base for justice anymore and open war between the two alliances is the only option left over. I want to prevent that in any way!
Notice that the American armies could easily take Boston by force, and march deep into Indian territory. Our army was, and still is, huge enough. We did not though. Once again: our sole purpose was taking Boston back.
We wanted to do this in a diplomatic way, with an army as backup. Our former king, Robert made mistakes, he left us therefor, which we still regret. Therefor America regrets the casualties that have fallen in Boston, we take responsibility for that. We do, however, not feel guilty or sorry for taking Boston back. Boston is an American city.
America is willing to pay India for the casualties though. We can give you 5 units of soldiers. We know that the children won't get their fathers back by that, but this is all we can do.
Boston is American, no matter what, no matter how. Therefor America has the strong opinion that peace can be agreed on right now, since all borders are fair at the current moment.
Apparantly India closed it's ears for fair reasoning. Therefor we will protect our cities. Not to invade India, because we see no use in that. But only to protect ourselves.
We hope that the allies of India will keep their ears open, we know that you value your friendship with the Indians, and we don't ask you to end this! We ask you to be fair though, and admit that Boston is American, and despite the mistakes made by Robert, America was allowed to take the city back.
Remember that in the end, the city was handed over peacefully to America! The city was not token by force!
I beg all nations to look at this issue unbiased.
Remember that nobody paid any money when America gave up Boston to India to end the World War!
Nobody had problems that America should give up this city to enforce peace.
Why are things different when India lost a city that wasn't theirs to begin with? Why do world leaders of fame feel sorry for India, while they didn't care for America in those days?
Once again: I beg the world for peace.
Let's end this, for once and for all.
George Washington
King of the Americans
I want to put an end on all speculation concerning the re-capturing of Boston by the Americans recently.
1. America has bought several troops from Germany. These troops were bought. These troops have never returned to Germany and are still under the American flag. America has payed much money for these troops.
2. America has lend a few troops from Germany as well. These troops have been used to defend the American cities in case of a huge war would follow and the American cities would be unprotected because it's soldiers were besieging Boston. America has paid much money for lending these troops.
3. America has bought several units from the French as well, again in exchange for money.
4. America has planned the besieging of Boston all by itself. It didn't want to have an open world war break out again. All allies have been informed shortly in advance (on which the German and the French insisted that their units should not be used for offensive purposes, which was no problem since America had more use for city defense)
The allies were asked to not intervene in the war and stay neutral, once again: to prevent an open world war to break out again.
5. America had not the intention to start an open war with India. Robert wanted to scare the Indians and push them into giving Boston back.
Robert made two mistakes. Firstly: he kept the greater part of the army beyond the sight of the Indians, for strategical purposes, which didn't match with his main goal, to frighten India. Therefor India was not frightened enough to give up Boston immediately.
Then, when India didn't gave in immediately, Robert made the mistake to start a small scale attack on Boston. He did this, once again, to show the Indian that it was serious business.
Strategically this worked perfectly. The Indian catapults inside Boston attacked the small part of the American army, only damaging a few units. The American catapults were used to clear the cultural defense of the city, and then the greater part of the army marched over the american ways to Boston (remember that Boston was still in American teritory, culturally. To attack the city, the american armies didn't need to march through Indian territory!)
When the Indians saw the huge army that Robert kept out of sight, they gave in, seeing that this army was huge enough to not only take Boston, but to march to Madras and perhaps even Delhi, and take it.
All nations should know that the army consisted of over 12 catapults, 15 macemen, 5 longbowmen, 8 crossbowmen and 4 spearmen.
The sole purpose of this army was to re-take Boston.
Boston is an American city which was token by force by the Indian. If the Indians are allowed to take Boston by force, then so is America allowed to take it back by force. The nations of Terra should, no matter were their loyalty lies, agree with this. If they do not, there's no base for justice anymore and open war between the two alliances is the only option left over. I want to prevent that in any way!
Notice that the American armies could easily take Boston by force, and march deep into Indian territory. Our army was, and still is, huge enough. We did not though. Once again: our sole purpose was taking Boston back.
We wanted to do this in a diplomatic way, with an army as backup. Our former king, Robert made mistakes, he left us therefor, which we still regret. Therefor America regrets the casualties that have fallen in Boston, we take responsibility for that. We do, however, not feel guilty or sorry for taking Boston back. Boston is an American city.
America is willing to pay India for the casualties though. We can give you 5 units of soldiers. We know that the children won't get their fathers back by that, but this is all we can do.
Boston is American, no matter what, no matter how. Therefor America has the strong opinion that peace can be agreed on right now, since all borders are fair at the current moment.
Apparantly India closed it's ears for fair reasoning. Therefor we will protect our cities. Not to invade India, because we see no use in that. But only to protect ourselves.
We hope that the allies of India will keep their ears open, we know that you value your friendship with the Indians, and we don't ask you to end this! We ask you to be fair though, and admit that Boston is American, and despite the mistakes made by Robert, America was allowed to take the city back.
Remember that in the end, the city was handed over peacefully to America! The city was not token by force!
I beg all nations to look at this issue unbiased.
Remember that nobody paid any money when America gave up Boston to India to end the World War!
Nobody had problems that America should give up this city to enforce peace.
Why are things different when India lost a city that wasn't theirs to begin with? Why do world leaders of fame feel sorry for India, while they didn't care for America in those days?
Once again: I beg the world for peace.
Let's end this, for once and for all.
George Washington
King of the Americans
Comment