Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hebrews: Chosen People, but not for Civ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Psst... Arabs are a civ in Civ4
    THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
    AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
    AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
    DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

    Comment


    • #17
      ive never been happy with the vague term "arab." there are dozens of arabian civs like the shiite, kurds, sunni, not to mention countries such as the syrians, iranians, jordanians, etc, AS WELL AS the arabs. all of whom might be sub-divisions of the religious branches of islam described above. im just saying they should include them if the hebrews are in. for BALANCE...




      piece
      Last edited by ZEE; February 19, 2007, 12:41.
      The Wizard of AAHZ

      Comment


      • #18
        I really doubt it. Arabs are a civ in Civ4. So are Persians, from which many draw their heritage. I can see some people getting upset on the inclusion of Hebrews if there were no Muslim Middle-Eastern civs included, but that's not the case. So, I really really doubt that the inclusion of Hebrews would trouble anyone except hardcore antisemites.
        Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
        Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
        I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Solver
          I really doubt it. Arabs are a civ in Civ4. So are Persians, from which many draw their heritage.
          And the Ottoman Turks, so that's 3 traditionally Muslim civs.

          Originally posted by Solver
          I can see some people getting upset on the inclusion of Hebrews if there were no Muslim Middle-Eastern civs included, but that's not the case. So, I really really doubt that the inclusion of Hebrews would trouble anyone except hardcore antisemites.
          Personally, I think the Hebrews' cultural contributions far outweigh those of any other so-called "minor civ" anyway.
          And for one, they've managed to survive as a relatively cohesive cultural, if not ethnic, entity for over 2000 years, and usually in hostile surroundings.

          And why include two Hebrew religions if the civ itself is not worthy of inclusion? But this is just scratching the surface of the iceberg.
          The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
          "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
          "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
          The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

          Comment


          • #20
            Hebrews: Why not

            If Hebrews were in the game, then they should be required to get the Jewish religion. Since it would a huge exploit/game-breaker for a player to know it was so decreed, I would prefer they not be included.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Hebrews: Why not

              Originally posted by Jaybe
              If Hebrews were in the game, then they should be required to get the Jewish religion. Since it would a huge exploit/game-breaker for a player to know it was so decreed, I would prefer they not be included.
              How come? I don't view the Hebrew culture and the religion Judaism to be mutually exclusive.
              The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
              "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
              "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
              The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

              Comment


              • #22
                Hebrews shouldn't be required to get Judaism any more than the Indians are required to get Hinduism. Civ isn't about playing through history, it's rewriting history.
                Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Solver
                  Hebrews shouldn't be required to get Judaism any more than the Indians are required to get Hinduism. Civ isn't about playing through history, it's rewriting history.
                  Indeed.
                  The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
                  "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
                  "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
                  The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Jaybe
                    If Hebrews were in the game, then they should be required to get the Jewish religion. Since it would a huge exploit/game-breaker for a player to know it was so decreed, I would prefer they not be included.
                    Why would that follow? India is in the game, but they don't automatically get Hinduism. And the Arabs don't automaticaly get Islam, nor the Chinese Confucianism.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      like i said in my first post in this thread, i understand fully why the hebrew would be a welcome addition. yet the tensions or worse that could follow is sadly a reality of our world. religious debates have caused major wars in history.

                      is adding the hebrew too risky for sid? possibly. would some people like to see them in the game? absolutely. would it cause problems for firaxis and thats why they havent put them in? who knows.


                      i stand by my earlier posts...



                      piece
                      The Wizard of AAHZ

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I'm pretty sure Jaybe was kidding.
                        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by AAHZ
                          yet the tensions or worse that could follow is sadly a reality of our world. religious debates have caused major wars in history.

                          is adding the hebrew too risky for sid?
                          The same issue that would make it too risky to include the Hebrews would also make it too risky to include the Arabs, though.
                          The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
                          "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
                          "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
                          The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            would it alexander? i think it wouldve been risky NOT to include the arabs even if it is vague representation. The Jewish religion IS present in civ4, a sort of culture of Hebrews that any civ can adopt. this is a tricky topic, and one of the most sensitive that ive been a part of here, so i mean to offend nobody.


                            great job putting all of this into a positive perspective though.



                            piece
                            The Wizard of AAHZ

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              BTW, it's spelled "peace"
                              THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                              AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                              AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                              DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by LordShiva
                                BTW, it's spelled "peace"

                                psst......






                                .......its a parody





                                piece
                                The Wizard of AAHZ

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X