![Evil](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/dev2.gif)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CTP PBEM Challenge Ladder June 2006
Collapse
X
-
Personally I want the ladder to show the active players only.
If “one” have not been in an active challengegame for say 3 month (or 6 months, but not more) – then “one” should be removed from the ladder.
As for getting the score-board cleared or not for a player returning to the ladder. Well, some would probably like to have it cleared. To make a fresh-start so to say. Especially if “one” has many lost games and only a few wins on the scoreboard. Anyway – if that isn’t a problem for the one managing the ladder, I’m fine with whatever decided…… as long a the returning player is placed on the ladder equal to a new player (according to note 1, 2 and 6).
If someone wants a “history” for players off the ladder, then it could be something like this:
Inactives:
NAME................BAID.......WIN.....LOSS....NAT
--------------------------------------------------------
berXpert............Deity.......13........1....MEX ,
Dimytes.............Deity.......15........0....SWE ,
checkMate...........Deity........7........6....USA ,
Protoss72000........Deity........1........0....USA ,
Nimrod..............Deity........1........2....USA ,
with no internal ranking.
Should some want a kind of ranking/history, a “day of removal” from the ladder could be added, so the most recent “removed” is “ranking” highest on the list.
Again, the one managing the ladder should agree with whatever decided as such a list can’t maintain itself.
/MaxFirst they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Gandhi
Comment
-
Originally posted by quinns
How do we define "inactives", again?
3 months should be acceptable, not dictating merely sharing is allHi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah
Comment
Comment