Next from Firaxis, please

[Nikolai]

Well, it suits me pretty well too, but I'd put in any Paradox game in the making too. Especially the coming EU3!

[DrSpike]

Originally posted by Jeje2

Well there we have it
2006 Q3 CIV4X
2007 Q3 Col2
2008 Q4 SMAC2
2009 Q3 SMAC2X
2010 Q4 CIV5


FIRAXIS: Feeling up to the little task?
(Now where's my huge consultant royalty for creative scheduling )

And why doesn't Col2 get an x-pack?

[Zoid]

There´s only 15 months as it is between the release of Col2 and SMAC2. No need to clutter up the market with another mildly useless Xpack

[DrSpike]

More clutter I say.

[Jeje2]

Originally posted by DrSpike
And why doesn't Col2 get an x-pack?

A perfect wellbalanced game doesn't need one

[ZargonX]

I'd like to see him tackle Railroad Tycoon again. I used to play that game for hours upon hours. Too bad the sequels done by others were lacking in one critical department: fun.

[DrSpike]

Originally posted by Jeje2


A perfect wellbalanced game doesn't need one

Of course it does. A good x-pack adds features as well as fixing the old ones.

[Paddy]

Get Civ IV working correctly

Then have the decency to finally finish Civ III Conquests

[DrSpike]

Tad overoptimistic there Paddy.

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by DrSpike
Tad overoptimistic there Paddy.

It starts with one small voice in the wilderness

Then we all chant




Fix the games! Fix The Games! Fix The Games!

[DrSpike]

And Firaxis go:

[Paddy]

sad but true time and again

[Krill]

? I understand what is wrong with C3C, and that is IMV mainly AI, but what is wrong with CIV now?

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Krill
? I understand what is wrong with C3C, and that is IMV mainly AI, but what is wrong with CIV now?

One thing and without my getting my bloodpressure up...

is...


MP

[DrSpike]

More specifically?