The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
I don't see the controversy. Even live, I considered it an incomplete pass. It was a great effort effort by Bryant, but it was clear that he lost control.
Totally agree. Ball hit the ground as he is turning over so it is a non-catch. That has been the rule for a long time. Can't believe Jeffrey and Marshall thought it was a good catch.
"I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Originally I thought it was the right call but the more I watched it, the more I could conceive that he was reaching out with the ball trying to score. If he was doing that, then it should have been a completed pass since that's considered a football move or whatever they call it.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
The smoking gun is that "making a football move" is never really defined. There's also AFAIK no defined difference between falling, being tackled, and diving for the ground.
But if a running back does the same thing on a pitchout (not a forward pass), with the exact same sequence of moves after getting the ball, it would be no fumble/down by contact.
And demon, you should not be surprised that other WRs would think it's a catch.
Apolyton's Grim Reaper2008, 2010 & 2011 RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms
John Harbaugh was mad at the referees for allowing the Patriots to run a play that was 100 percent legal.
To be a legal formation, the circled player has to uneligible, while the player with the line starting from him is eligible. Deceptive? Heck yes, 100% legal? maybe not.
It's legal, but the execution was very sneaky, because Shane Vereen declared himself ineligible last-second.
The Competition Committee will undoubtedly look at this and have a say about the moment a player declares himself ineligible, but I don't think the formation should be outlawed, because it can be categorized as an "unbalanced line".
Originally I thought it was the right call but the more I watched it, the more I could conceive that he was reaching out with the ball trying to score. If he was doing that, then it should have been a completed pass since that's considered a football move or whatever they call it.
The divot he creates with his left foot definitely suggests that he was trying to thrust himself into the end zone. However, in assessing whether he made a football move, this situation--and you need to view it at actual speed--is similar to the "bang bang" play when assessing fumble versus incomplete pass.
"I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
No actually pleased that they got FOX. It's been awhile since we hired a head coach with actual NFL experience.
He may not be the best but the others that they were looking at didn't exactly excite me at all.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment