Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
View Post
As for "very good', I can probably accept that as well although he still has some amazingly bad miscues and more of them than most goalies in the playoffs.
What I have not seen is the type of amazing or exceptional goaltending, either statistically or subjectively that screams that Luongo is an all time great. If he gets to the finals or wins a cup, he knock on his playoff resume will be eliminated and his stock will rise but overall I think to be an all time great you should be someone that is viewed as the best goalie overall at some point and preferably, dominate for a period of time.
Luongo? even you acknowledged that the first goal he gave up was Luongo's blatant mistake. This was erased and he got the win but the goaltending story on the night was how Vancouver essentially overcame adversity when Luongo put them in a hole and Niemi kept SJ in a game where they were being completely outclassed. In that game I can credit Luongo for being very good the rest of the game and he did get the win . .. . But being viewed as being outplayed is not the hallmark of the super-elite
I believe that journalits have essentially concluded so far that Crawford outplayed Luongo, Rinne outplayed Luongo and that in game one Niemi outplayed Luongo.
Luongo does enough to win on a very good team but to be considered great you often need more
Comment