Snoopy, I apologize for the tone.
But your contention is purely laughable. "Gets them a little tired?"??
Come on!!! This is FOOTBALL!!!!
1. If the kicker is unaware, more fool him.
2. Tires them out?? HAHAHAHAHAHA! PLEASE. It's a physical sport. I would argue that the holder/kicker/long snapper (who admittedly must block) have perhaps the LEAST physically demanding jobs on the field. And they do them far less often than the offensive and defensive elevens. If they can't handle the physical demands of running the play an extra time and/or lack the mental toughness to execute it, they should not be playing pro sports for a living. It's SUPPOSED to be a physical and mental challenge.
3. It's no more an "out of game tactic" than clock management. It's a strategic use of the timeout. It's called good coaching. Sounds to me like you hate the simple fact that it works. If a team's field goal unit is its achilles heel, it's the opposing coach's job to exploit/expose it.
But your contention is purely laughable. "Gets them a little tired?"??
Come on!!! This is FOOTBALL!!!!
...the kicker is unaware of the timeout being taken. That causes the kick to take place, which tires out the kicker, the snapper, and the holder some, puts more stress on the kicker mentally, and for some reason seems to regularly work...
2. Tires them out?? HAHAHAHAHAHA! PLEASE. It's a physical sport. I would argue that the holder/kicker/long snapper (who admittedly must block) have perhaps the LEAST physically demanding jobs on the field. And they do them far less often than the offensive and defensive elevens. If they can't handle the physical demands of running the play an extra time and/or lack the mental toughness to execute it, they should not be playing pro sports for a living. It's SUPPOSED to be a physical and mental challenge.
I consider it a poor thing to allow - not necessarily unfair in the sense that it can certainly happen to either team, but bad for the game in that it is an out of game tactic that impacts the play on the field.
Comment