Take time to actually look at the football forums why don't you.
I have. Aside from West Ham supporters you are getting pummled.
Kindly look up 'dishonesty and deceit', if I said "I am wearing black briefs", would I not be guilty of dishonesty and deceit when it was subsequently found out the were actually blue - and shock of shocks! BOXERS!!!
Because when the independant commission says 'dishonest and deceit', they are really making no distinction between lying about breaking a rule or lying about something meaningless... yep.
The important word is WAS, as in past tense
And I don't think a club should get off the hook simply because it was the former owner who did the illegal thing. Who says Tevez would have signed with West Ham in the first place without his economic rights company goading him into it?
This is the Premiership in the UK, not Italy so different laws apply - which incidentally exposes you to further calls of double standards wrt to Colon's point which you jumped on with eagerness, about West Ham's wrongdoing here being perfectly legal elsewhere!
There is that reading comprehension problem again. Was I saying they should follow Italian law? Obviously not. Was I comparing official decisions relating to two different teams? Why yes, yes I was. Though you didn't answer the question of the official decision on AC Milan. Agree with it? If not, why not... it's an official decision? They have plenty of official folks on their side.
The writers maybe, but they have a vested interest in selling papers - but there are also plenty on our side...
Yeah, West Ham supporters.
Comment