Is joining WePlayCiv in effect condoning Death Threats?

[St Jon]

I find it very sad that the majority of posters on this thread actually have no active part in what the site is really about. You don't contribue anything to the forum in any constructive way! If you wish to discuss the rights and wrongs of circumcision or same sex marriage then there are an abundance of news groups available to you.

Why bemoan Poly's decline and then be outraged about WPC and pray for its' failure?

[Kuciwalker]

So what you're saying is it is irrelevant.

No?

It's not a reason to close the thread, or ignore your complaints.

It is a reason for people to dislike you.

Note: I actually don't dislike you.

[DaShi]

It used to; I stopped because it got boring.

This is still a rather childish response.

[Kuciwalker]

I find it very sad that the majority of posters on this thread actually have no active part in what the site is really about. You don't contribue anything to the forum in any constructive way! If you wish to discuss the rights and wrongs of circumcision or same sex marriage then there are an abundance of news groups available to you.

Why bemoan Poly's decline and then be outraged about WPC and pray for its' failure?

Is this a return of the "the OTF is useless" faction?

I guarantee that if the admin takes that approach to the OTF, this site will die quickly.

[Asher]

It's not a reason to close the thread, or ignore your complaints.

It is a reason for people to dislike you.

If people dislike me for making threads that they don't have to read, then I will cry myself to sleep tonight.

Surely you know by now, Kuci, that I am not here to be liked. Contrary to many (most?) other people here, I'm not here begging for friendship. I'm a straight-shooting kind of guy, I tell people what's on my mind. If I don't like someone, they know it. People know where I stand.

I don't expect to be liked by everyone. I don't care. Enough people do like me for who I am, and that's nice I guess, but it's not what I look for. I prefer honesty and openness to polite protocol and and passive aggressiveness.

I don't even know what we are arguing about.

We'll return to root: Vel attacked me in an unprovoked attack, we don't even have a history. I responded, he pretended not to be hurt and replied with a long-winded reply proving otherwise. You jumped to his defense for unknown reasons other than you like to be a contrarian.

[St Jon]

Will it be lamented?

[DinoDoc]

Rest easy, Kuci. I'd wager the light ban KH got indicates the fact they won't take that view.

[Asher]

Will it be lamented?

Who are you? Why are you jumping in the crossfire? What is the on topic? What is going on? Who are these people !

Out of the way, son, men are dueling here.

[notyoueither]

Will it be lamented?

Yes, it would. By me.

[Jon Miller]

We are going light on everyone right now due to knowing that people aren't entirely comfortable with the change.

Making me see tubgirl will result in a longer ban in the future.

JM

[Asher]

We are going light on everyone right now due to knowing that people aren't entirely comfortable with the change.

Making me see tubgirl will result in a longer ban in the future.

JM

What if I photoshopped a Polytoner's face on it? (Note: Not saying where it'd go!)

Would that reduce the sentence?

[Jon Miller]

No.

JM

[Kuciwalker]

If people dislike me for making threads that they don't have to read, then I will cry myself to sleep tonight.

You get mighty upset about people making posts you don't have to read.

Surely you know by now, Kuci, that I am not here to be liked. Contrary to many (most?) other people here, I'm not here begging for friendship. I'm a straight-shooting kind of guy, I tell people what's on my mind. If I don't like someone, they know it. People know where I stand.

I don't expect to be liked by everyone. I don't care. Enough people do like me for who I am, and that's nice I guess, but it's not what I look for. I prefer honesty and openness to polite protocol and and passive aggressiveness.

I don't even know what we are arguing about.

We'll return to root: I pointed out that you are a drama queen (truth) and that you had begun a habit of attacking the on-topic contributions of posters (truth). I advised the targets of these attacks to just ignore you because it's just a ploy to get under their skins.

You responded to this with... (let's look it up) "Candle'bre is worthless".

We'll return to root: Vel attacked me in an unprovoked attack, we don't even have a history. I responded, he pretended not to be hurt and replied with a long-winded reply proving otherwise. You jumped to his defense for unknown reasons other than you like to be a contrarian.

I'm getting tired of you driving away on-topic contributors, as well as people I enjoy talking to (lotm).

[notyoueither]

We are going light on everyone right now due to knowing that people aren't entirely comfortable with the change.

Making me see tubgirl will result in a longer ban in the future.

JM

Look over here, Jon.

[St Jon]

Who are you? Why are you jumping in the crossfire? What is the on topic? What is going on? Who are these people !

Out of the way, son, men are dueling here.

1. My profile is genuine so read it if you are that interested.

2. Because I had a point to make.

3. Too little for my liking but still a lot of people making an effort.

4. Too vague to answer.

5. Ditto.

6. That is an unbelievably supercilious attitude and makes no contribution to reasoned debate.