Announcement

**Asher** · May 3, 2009, 22:49

Originally posted by TCO View Post

Asher is growing on me a bit. and he and Kittie are hockey tight. But Kittie is actually a lot better than either Glonk or I at just being annoying in a non oringinal way.

Maybe I should go back to Glonk in accordance with the sea change in the direction of this site. Back to square one.

**Kuciwalker** · May 3, 2009, 22:50

Plus you think she's hot.

I leave her well enough alone until she talks about me. Fair is fair.

It's more Drake and KH doing the whining there.

Candle'bre is worthless. Have you tried the public demo? How many years did this take?

Who cares?

If the only thing you're going to do on this forum is randomly insult people's pet projects, I'll be happy when they ban you.

LOTM is/was a one-trick pony about Judaism.

So what?

You should be thanking me, my hounding of it got him to knock it off here.

Why?

Actually, Kuci, that describes you. (Honestly)

It used to; I stopped because it got boring.

**Drake Tungsten** · May 3, 2009, 22:52

I counted 3 Judaism references in random spots tonight alone in his posts. I'm not joking.

I didn't see all three, but he did make a nonsensical reference about his family's former Japanese exchange student being the one person in Osaka who knows more about Judaism than almost anyone else. Wouldn't "one person" imply that they knew more about Judaism than every other person in Osaka? And how can that even be true when there are observant Jews living in Osaka?

It's more Drake and KH doing the whining there.

No whining on my part. I just feel the need to disagree when other posters talk about how funny and interesting she is.

**Asher** · May 3, 2009, 22:53

Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post

Who cares?

If the only thing you're going to do on this forum is randomly insult people's pet projects, I'll be happy when they ban you.

It's not random. I don't even give a **** about Vel, but he's been following me around and saying **** about me here and elsewhere. And no, it is not semantics to argue about what 'randomly' means. You just don't know what it means, apparently.

So what?

Namedropping Judaism in every thread is every bit as obnoxious is trying to make everything a sexual pun.

Why?

If you have to ask, it's not worth discussing.

It used to; I stopped because it got boring.

If you say so...

**Jon Miller** · May 3, 2009, 22:54

OK, all trolls have to turn good at midnight.

Then I am closing this thread, if you continue to troll I will give some timeout.

JM

**Lefty Scaevola** · May 3, 2009, 22:55

Originally posted by Asher View Post

What's worse than a felony?

Displeasing me, in any manner or degree.

**Drake Tungsten** · May 3, 2009, 22:56

OK, all trolls have to turn good at midnight.

Pacific time? You need to be fair to Oerdin...

**Jon Miller** · May 3, 2009, 22:57

Nah, eastern.

JM

**Asher** · May 3, 2009, 22:59

It's pretty much run out of steam anyway.

Unless another whack-o-mole pops up. Kuci is giving me hope.

**DinoDoc** · May 3, 2009, 23:00

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten View Post

OK, all trolls have to turn good at midnight.

Pacific time? You need to be fair to Oerdin...

Why?

**DinoDoc** · May 3, 2009, 23:01

Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

OK, all trolls have to turn good at midnight.

Then I am closing this thread, if you continue to troll I will give some timeout.

JM

You really need a new catch phrase.

**Kuciwalker** · May 3, 2009, 23:03

It's not random. I don't even give a **** about Vel, but he's been following me around and saying **** about me here and elsewhere. And no, it is not semantics to argue about what 'randomly' means. You just don't know what it means, apparently.

Dude, you start every single one of these. You're incredibly good at getting people to overreact to you, or at least you're good at picking targets that will, but you start it.

(You've also gotten pretty good at doing so without breaking any rules.)

After you piss someone off, they start stalking you or whatever, and you guys keep getting arguments. The other person finally crosses some line and it spreads beyond you and the target. Some people defend you, some defend the target. As of late, one of those defenses has often been "this person was an important contributor to the on-topic". You're response is usually "all his contributions suck", which is

1) obviously subjective

2) irrelevant

3) very inflammatory <-- this is the real reason you do it

The only response you should have is "on-topic contributions shouldn't matter in the off-topic forum". Anything else just highlights the fact that you enjoy these spats.

**Jon Miller** · May 3, 2009, 23:04

Hmm, Gremlins?

JM

**Kuciwalker** · May 3, 2009, 23:04

Namedropping Judaism in every thread is every bit as obnoxious is trying to make everything a sexual pun.

So again, his only sin is that he failed to amuse you.

**Kuciwalker** · May 3, 2009, 23:05

No whining on my part. I just feel the need to disagree when other posters talk about how funny and interesting she is.

There's probably some kind of observation bias involved, but lately I've seen far more negative comments about her than positive.

Announcement

Is joining WePlayCiv in effect condoning Death Threats?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment