Who thinks the Orange Buffoon has finally overstepped the mark...?

[Bereta_Eder]

It is unreasonable to expect me to distinguish the insane and stupid things you routinely say with the (apparent) intention that people take them seriously from the insane and stupid things you say as jokes. Especially when you double down and say "how is that a troll?" If nothing you say is ever intended to be taken seriously, then your sense of humor is pretty bad.

so let me make it plain once more.

english colonialism on the scale of suffering was worse than nazi germany and people of superior race than the english (english thought they were inferior) suffered more than the jews. (or the communists or the homosexuals)

[Bereta_Eder]

the thing about the wlesh language was a joke thought, you'd have to be living under a rock to believe I was serious about the welsh language but joking about english colonialism

[N35t0r]

so let me make it plain once more.

english colonialism on the scale of suffering was worse than nazi germany and people of superior race than the english (english thought they were inferior) suffered more than the jews. (or the communists or the homosexuals)

That's stupid.

[Dauphin]

Nazis condensed all there bad stuff into less than a decade while the English / British Empire did it for over a century.

Don't think the Irish or the Indians would think the statement stupid.

[Dauphin]

To clarify, doing bad things for a short time vs a long time is not my point. Rather that if you do a lot of killing all at once, it tends to be more noticeable.

[N35t0r]

Nazis condensed all there bad stuff into less than a decade while the English / British Empire did it for over a century.

Don't think the Irish or the Indians would think the statement stupid.

I don't think the English's plan was to completely wipe the Irish and/or Indians off the face of the earth, which is why we traditionally see the Nazis as extra bad.
In any case, I didn't think that post was stupid because I don't think the actions of the British Empire are reprehensible (mostly I do), but because he goes on to declare that some cultures/peoples are 'better races' than the english, which is disgusting racist behaviour. He then goes on to say how they suffered more than the Jews; when you're discussing being on the receiving end of genocide, arguing who had it worse sounds like petty oneupism at best and borderline denial at worst.

That's why I think his post is stupid. Not that I expect any actual arguments from him, hence the curtness of my previous reply.

[Dauphin]

Fair enough.

I had a wry smile at his inferiority comment. There was famously an Englishman with an inferiority complex - he thought he was everyone's equal.

[Dauphin]

Also, yeah, English treatment through colonialization was more about casual racism. And agree, if your people are suffering and dying because of it, I don't think it really matters what the cause is from your point of view - the consequences are the same.

[Aeson]

The English also helped with genocide in the the Americas and Africa, and did Australia, Tasmania, and New Zealand on their own. The opium wars. We're still dealing with (and mimicking) their ****ery in the Middle East.

[I AM MOBIUS]

Gee, that was a lot of Iranians supporting the funeral of their dead leader - I thought the entire country was supposed to hate the regime...? 🤷

I guess they wanted to celebrate Iran's epic and total strategic victory over the US and Israel... 😅

[I AM MOBIUS]

This is shaping up to possibly be the most catastrophic defeat in US history... 🤡🍿🤡🍿🤡

Called it from the start. I thank you all ☺️👍

[BeBMan]

Called it from the start. I thank you all ☺️👍

Thx for your input, Serb.

[Bereta_Eder]

I don't think the English's plan was to completely wipe the Irish and/or Indians off the face of the earth, which is why we traditionally see the Nazis as extra bad.
In any case, I didn't think that post was stupid because I don't think the actions of the British Empire are reprehensible (mostly I do), but because he goes on to declare that some cultures/peoples are 'better races' than the english, which is disgusting racist behaviour. He then goes on to say how they suffered more than the Jews; when you're discussing being on the receiving end of genocide, arguing who had it worse sounds like petty oneupism at best and borderline denial at worst.

That's why I think his post is stupid. Not that I expect any actual arguments from him, hence the curtness of my previous reply.

If you took my comment aabout the inferiority of the english "race" at face value and nit tongue in cheek (that was RAGINGLY obvious seeing as I flipped those basrards argument on its head) then you are way dumber than I thought. WAY dumber

[Bereta_Eder]

ABout english being worse than the nazis, there certaintly an argument to be made. except if you want to judge historical cruelty by the breivity of it and not the magnitude. Which is like liking condenced milk because it has more sugar (I know that went over your head too)

[Bereta_Eder]

maybe your ancestors were of english decent and wanted to mix only with their race in the new world.

you definitely don't sound as smart as the spanisnh/portugeuse that had COITUS with everything that moved and was nice.

you probably call them fakland islands too

[Bereta_Eder]

Nazis condensed all there bad stuff into less than a decade while the English / British Empire did it for over a century.

Don't think the Irish or the Indians would think the statement stupid.

I was thinking more about the utter dehumanizing attrocities and slave bazaars in africa and the genocide of peoples there. I know you wanted to keep them alive so they could collect the sugar so if that makes you better than the germans, ok.

I habve no idea what you did to the irish and the indians

(you= your ancestors)
(germans=germans)