Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Nixon wanted to nuke Vietnam, period! Despite Vietnam was no threat to US.
    No, Nixon wanted to Nuke Syria (when it looked like Israel might fall) not Vietnam. But...HE DIDN't...and that is kinda the point really.
    "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

    Comment


    • Trump wanted to Nuke N. Korea and blame it on someone else.........
      I am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
      Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
      Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Serb View Post
        And that is why no matter of your lies, we will always beat you.
        PURE FPP. You know Serb, the reason you don't realize it is because almost your entire nation has it. Putin's case may be the worst and will probably prove fatal.
        "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Broken_Erika View Post
          Trump wanted to Nuke N. Korea and blame it on someone else.........
          So what? China probably wants to Nuke North Korea. It's a pain in the a$$ to everyone.
          "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

          Comment


          • Broken_Erika
            Broken_Erika commented
            Editing a comment
            China has a defensive pact with N>Korea, so if someone attacked them China would be obligated to intervene. But if N.Korea attacked first, China would seal the border and declare neutrality. I.E. Fsck you you're on your own.

        • Originally posted by Serb View Post

          BS. You are the only Nation on Earth who had ever used nukes and you have used it against a country, which had none.
          why does Russia constantly refer to its nukes but NATO members, US included hardly ever do?

          Originally posted by Serb View Post
          It's you who had initiated a coup on the Russian border.
          Imagine for a second Russia installs a pro-Russian regime at Mexico or Canada.
          Very unlikely but my imagination can tackle that. Probability of US annexation or nuclear strike to either? Zero percent. Hell, Mexico might already be pro russian...nobody will care beyond diplomatic noises
          Last edited by Geronimo; January 13, 2023, 17:11.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Serb View Post



            Nixon wanted to nuke Vietnam, period! Despite Vietnam was no threat to US.



            What is so intersting about that?

            You have removed your missiles from Turkey, we have removed our missiles from Cuba + your promise to never invade Cuda again.

            Nixon must not have wanted to very badly.

            ...and yes, US promises seem to have some weight.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Serb View Post

              All the Ukranian information centers, created exactly for the purposing of spreading alike propaganda are happy that you heard their fakes.
              Such centers for propaganda are officially parts of Ukranian military and you are just and idiot!
              Ok, so you are going with the lie and deny route even though most countries have evaluated the evidence and has determined Russia has systematically been committing war crimes as a part of state policy under the Putin dictatorship. They also have the FSB running torture and execution centers systematically in the illegally occupied territories.

              It is sad you are supporting crimes against humanity.
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Geronimo View Post

                why does Russia constantly refer to its nukes but NATO members, US included hardly ever do?


                Very unlikely but my imagination can tackle that. Probability of US annexation or nuclear strike to either? Zero percent. Hell, Mexico might already be pro russian...nobody will care beyond diplomatic noises
                Mostly because they know politically, economically, and definitely militarily they are vastly inferior and backwards. They couldn't even manage to run a convoy to Kiev without running out of gas and food because of all the pervasive corruption and incompetence. This nuclear chest beating is the only way to get over their butt hurt.

                You will also notice that Putin himself tapped down on the nuclear talk (which he had been using to destract domestic audiences from the **** show of failure he caused in Ukraine). Peter Zeihan claims intelligence officials told him the US informed Putin they know exactly where he is 24/7 and if he orders any nuke launch against any target world wide then the US would not go after Russia but send a nuke to Putin personally. Thus Putin knows he will be the first to die. Suddenly, Putin lost interest in nuclear threats.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by PLATO View Post

                  Speaking of using Nukes. I wouldn't be here without them. Dad was scheduled in the first wave for the invasion of Japan. After the surrender, he was also involved in the dismantling of the Japanese shore defenses. It was obvious that the Marines would have taken horrific losses.

                  This is an example of when Nukes should be used. The use of nuclear weapons on Japan, while horrific in its own right, saved the lives of literally millions of Japanese and Americans. This is totally different than the type of use you keep spouting off about.
                  Blah-blah-blah.

                  Hiroshima and Nagasaki were:
                  a) An experiment.
                  b) Demonstration of force to your ally - Soviet Union.


                  Had Roosevelt was still alive you would never used it, because there was no any military necessity for that - after the enterence of USSR in war vs. Japan (which was YOUR demand at the Potsdam's conference) and the destruction of Quantung army , Japan would have been defeated with conventional arms only.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by PLATO View Post

                    No, Nixon wanted to Nuke Syria (when it looked like Israel might fall) not Vietnam. But...HE DIDN't...and that is kinda the point really.
                    That's an addition to Vietnam and that fact that you didn't just points out that back then you were SANE (because such action would risk WW3 and extermination of humanity), not insane like now.

                    Now you are completely insane and honestly think you can do anything you like and still be safe and sound.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Broken_Erika View Post
                      Trump wanted to Nuke N. Korea and blame it on someone else.........
                      And after that he was kissing Kim Chen In in lips saying what a great guy he is. You are afraid of a guy who had just invented a primitive first generation nuke, but at the same time you still honestly believe that you can easily defeat a country with an half of century more advanced nuclear and missile technology than you has.

                      Who are you, if not idiots and clowns?

                      Comment


                      • Broken_Erika
                        Broken_Erika commented
                        Editing a comment
                        Calling Trump an Idiot or Clown is Insulting to Idiots and Clowns.

                    • That is no the path you are good at, so we will just crush you and your Western lackeys.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by PLATO View Post

                        So what? China probably wants to Nuke North Korea.
                        In your wet dreams only.

                        It's a pain in the a$$ to everyone.
                        You are the pain in the ass to everyone and the sole reason why NK has nukes now, because you have demonstrated very well to the rest of the World what you do with the ones whom you proclaim as your enemy, if he doesn't have nukes.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Geronimo View Post

                          Nixon must not have wanted to very badly.

                          ...and yes, US promises seem to have some weight.


                          Your American word weights NOTHING!!!

                          And you have clearly demonstrated that to the rest of the World during the last 30 years.
                          You have broken, rapped and annihilated the international law by all possible means you like during that period. You have destroyed the whole conception of the international law and now want to substitute it with some kind of mysterious "rules" known only to you and your Western lackeys.

                          Not to mention all your illegal wars of agression, your every new administration claims that it has no responsibility for the treaties the previous one have signed and sees nothing wrong with that!

                          You have broken all possible internetional agreements you have signed from the climate change and free trade to the key strategical agreements about World's security and peace.
                          Just a few example of key strategic agreements you have broken:
                          - the Anti-ballistic missile treaty (ABMT)
                          - the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC)
                          - the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INFT)
                          - the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty (NPT)
                          -
                          the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)
                          - the Treaty on Open Skies
                          - the nuclear treaty with Iran

                          Your word is NOTHING, Americans!
                          Absolutely NOTHING!!!

                          Last edited by Serb; January 13, 2023, 23:01.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Serb View Post

                            Blah-blah-blah.

                            Hiroshima and Nagasaki were:
                            a) An experiment.
                            b) Demonstration of force to your ally - Soviet Union.


                            Had Roosevelt was still alive you would never used it, because there was no any military necessity for that - after the enterence of USSR in war vs. Japan (which was YOUR demand at the Potsdam's conference) and the destruction of Quantung army , Japan would have been defeated with conventional arms only.
                            The best estimates at the time was that invading the Japanese home islands would cost 1 million casualties. So, yes, they were going to get used to avoid such loses.
                            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X