Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Just came across this:

    Fu Cong, China's Ambassador to the EU, said that statements about "no limits to friendship" between China and Russian are "nothing but rhetoric". Source: The New York Times citing Fu Cong's interview; RBC, citing the statement of Dmitry Peskov, Press Secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Details: Fu Cong said China was not on Russia's side in the war and that some people deliberately misinterpreted the declaration about 'no limit friendship' between China and Russia, signed on the
    Blah

    Comment


    • Global warming might have saved Ukraine over the winter, it didn't get cold enough to freeze the ground. From what I hear it'll be over soon after the ground dries enough for heavy machinery. Zelensky is warning Bakhmut could fall and implying Ukraine will be done when it does. I'm surprised they're lasting this long, I'd say the mission was accomplished. Putin wont be conquering Europe any time soon.

      Comment


      • So, are you saying Putin will be conquering Ukraine soon?
        “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

        ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

        Comment


        • No, that was never the goal. I was addressing the people who said this was about protecting Europe. The goal was a quick war and peace deal granting the east autonomy/independence with a Ukrainian commitment to neutrality. That failed when the Russian army advancing on Kiev was pulled back to deal with the war in the east, but that will be the end result. Eastern Ukraine will vote on their future and Kiev will be largely demilitarized.

          Comment


          • More likely the occupied territories will be retaken, as the Russian army retreats collaborators and people who support the Putin regime will flee with them, then the people who remain will mostly be pro-Ukraine.

            It is possible that Russia out lasts Ukraine and western help dries up but we shall see.
            Last edited by Dinner; April 6, 2023, 21:57.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • An article from the CBC
              A Russian defector who was an officer in Russian President Vladimir Putin's secretive elite personal security service said moral opposition to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and his fear of dying there drove him to flee the country with his wife and children and to speak out.

              I am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
              Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
              Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!

              Comment


              • IIRC that guy also sez Putin requires everyone to got into quarantine before visiting him. My take is if Putin would get hugged more this war wouldn't have happened, but those quarantine rules prevent that anybody comes close enough to hug him
                Last edited by BeBMan; April 7, 2023, 03:48. Reason: yay
                Blah

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                  No, that was never the goal. I was addressing the people who said this was about protecting Europe. The goal was a quick war and peace deal granting the east autonomy/independence with a Ukrainian commitment to neutrality. That failed when the Russian army advancing on Kiev was pulled back to deal with the war in the east, but that will be the end result. Eastern Ukraine will vote on their future and Kiev will be largely demilitarized.
                  Since when has any country had to be demilitarized? Even East and West Germany got capable modern militaries and after invading Iran and Kuwait and getting smacked with regime change Iraq and post Taliban Afghanistan got militaries. Where the hell does Russia get the right to have demilitarized neighbors? Especially neighbors it likes to annex land from?

                  Comment


                  • Uncle Sparky
                    Uncle Sparky commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Japan after WW2 had to demilitarize... The two are the same thing for Berz and his types. When Mexico attacks the US to regain its occupied territories and avenge the way Hispanics are treated in the southern states, Berz and his kind will be 100% behind them.

                • Originally posted by Geronimo View Post

                  Since when has any country had to be demilitarized? Even East and West Germany got capable modern militaries and after invading Iran and Kuwait and getting smacked with regime change Iraq and post Taliban Afghanistan got militaries. Where the hell does Russia get the right to have demilitarized neighbors? Especially neighbors it likes to annex land from?
                  In "Berzworld" anything is possible.
                  "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                  Comment


                  • Uncle Sparky
                    Uncle Sparky commented
                    Editing a comment
                    I'm sure the Russian army will provide security for Ukraine after demilitarization... just like the US did in Japan.

                  • Berzerker
                    Berzerker commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Do you think Russia will let Ukraine join Nato or re-arm after all this? The possible is a few months away.

                • Originally posted by Geronimo View Post

                  Since when has any country had to be demilitarized? Even East and West Germany got capable modern militaries and after invading Iran and Kuwait and getting smacked with regime change Iraq and post Taliban Afghanistan got militaries. Where the hell does Russia get the right to have demilitarized neighbors? Especially neighbors it likes to annex land from?
                  After the USSR fell the west agreed not to push Nato weaponry into E Germany, but E Germany didn't spend 8 years in a proxy war on Russia's border. It took 8 years of war in the Donbas to get us here, did Russia 'like' that? We did.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

                    After the USSR fell the west agreed not to push Nato weaponry into E Germany, but E Germany didn't spend 8 years in a proxy war on Russia's border. It took 8 years of war in the Donbas to get us here, did Russia 'like' that? We did.
                    It's none of Russia's business. This is like Grenada under Reagan when Washington would invade because an unfriendly leftist revolutionary coup tried to ally Grenada with Washington's enemies. Did you think that was just peachy Berz? Did Washington have a right to do that? What if Reagon had waited until a subsequent election replaced the leftist usurpers and then invaded to depose the new elected government multiple elections after the coup? Better? How about if after waiting for multiple elections to invade Reagon also annexed Grenada and rounded up all the children of the leftists and sent them to be adopted into US families? Is it getting better?

                    Russia is pulling the same heavy handed arrogant **** that you hated the US doing in the 80's. Why are you Okay with that?

                    Comment


                    • Of course it's their business, Azov spent 8 years shelling the Donbas driving millions from their homes with many fleeing to Russia. Either you believe the people of the Donbas have the right to be left alone or you believe neo-Nazis have the moral authority to kill them for rejecting their right wing coup. If Trump actually seized power in a coup and sent a neo-Nazi army to attack Oregonians for 8 years because they refused to recognize his authority would you support Trump?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

                        After the USSR fell the west agreed not to push Nato weaponry into E Germany, but E Germany didn't spend 8 years in a proxy war on Russia's border. It took 8 years of war in the Donbas to get us here, did Russia 'like' that? We did.
                        Funny how no one there remembers that on either side. It was as only a decade later that Putin invented that lie. I guess a sucker is born every minute because you believed his B.S..
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • Meanwhile Putin admitted that Biden revealed that Medvedev said he and Zelensky agreed that Macron and Xi talked about Scholz who noted that Duda called Stoltenberg who phoned Schoigu when Peskov announced a prisoner swap where US journalist Gershkovich is released in exchange for Putin turning himself in to The Hague.
                          Blah

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                            Of course it's their business, Azov spent 8 years shelling the Donbas driving millions from their homes with many fleeing to Russia. Either you believe the people of the Donbas have the right to be left alone or you believe neo-Nazis have the moral authority to kill them for rejecting their right wing coup. If Trump actually seized power in a coup and sent a neo-Nazi army to attack Oregonians for 8 years because they refused to recognize his authority would you support Trump?
                            There is no universe where the people in the Donbas are "left alone" by the special operation. Regardless of what a rogue president did anywhere a justification for another state to annex territory from the rogue president's state, especially under threat of use of WMD by the other state will never occur. In a scenario like that I'd want the separatists to surrender to the "nazis" and join them in repelling the WMD foreign state whether I lived there or if it was anyplace at all really.

                            Are you really saying that allowing prolonged separatist conflict to serve as an excuse for other countries to annex parts of the separatist areas would not be enormously destabilizing? That wouldn't invite hundreds of new conflicts and endless bloodshed? If it looks like having nukes is the price of admission for that behavior won't everybody need nukes to participate or to avoid it? That's OK Berz?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X